golfballs
Mostly Peaceful Poster
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 75,328
- Likes
- 57,577
Well this is literally happing in that same park as we speak
It’s not a “bad apple” argument. There has been clear evidence over the course of several days that there are multiple groups involved. They probably do share some common members, but are not entirely homogenous. I’m not sure I’d go around advertising my inability to figure that out, if I were you.Ah yes, the “bad apple”. Ironic
Police we’re having objects thrown at them that’s why they used the smoke bombs.What the hell does that have to do with those protestors at the time? Are you incapable of reading what I asked? Of course you are. You just can’t admit that trump shut down a whole hell of a lot of people’s 1A that day. You are better then this. At least I thought.
No it is literally a “bad apple” argument. Which of course is ironic considering the supposed purpose behind these protests. As far as the rest of your rant, Covid crybaby? I don’t even know what the **** your talking about.It’s not a “bad apple” argument. There has been clear evidence over the course of several days that there are multiple groups involved. They probably do share some common members, but are not entirely homogenous. I’m not sure I’d go around advertising my inability to figure that out, if I were you.
Your ****ed up logic would justify government use of force against literally anybody because we can’t be sure that they weren’t involved in some violent protest at some point. Talk about irony, I’m pretty sure you were one of the COVId crybabies talking about freedom. Turned out you don’t care about freedom at all.
If it's your implication that I'm more concerned with trump using force against american's exercising their 2a Rights over an extinguished fire, you're right. Thanks for allowing me the opportunity to confirm your suspicion.
Also, it was tear gas as was confirmed by a Reverend on the scene.. Come to terms with the fact that hannity lied to you.
No, it literally isn’t, dipshit. Guilt by association doesn’t justify government use of force. There’s no apple involved, but I guess you had to make some more **** up since your “they started a fire” narrative turned out to have come straight from your rectum.No it is literally a “bad apple” argument. Which of course is ironic considering the supposed purpose behind these protests. As far as the rest of your rant, Covid crybaby? I don’t even know what the **** your talking about.
I’d love to see the super cut of how the MSM has described these riots as “peaceful protests”It’s very concerning if force was used against peaceful protesters, but give it a rest with your faux outrage. You and many others on this board cheered during an unconstitutional lockdown when pastors were arrested for having church services. Quit trying to cherry pick whose rights are protected and whose aren’t.
I haven’t seen anything to suggest that the protestors in Lafayette park were anything but that. Have you? Serious question.
“It only takes 1 person to start a fire“No, it literally isn’t, dipshit. Guilt by association doesn’t justify government use of force. There’s no apple involved, but I guess you had to make some more **** up since your “they started a fire” narrative turned out to have come straight from your rectum.
Yeah really hard to believe any of these protesters would throw something at the policeI asked the same thing earlier and the Park Service statement got posted and it outlined that protesters were violent. It’s why I commented that it looks like we’re going to have to wait on Fed video because that area is surely tricked out with mics and cams being that close to the WH.
“It only takes 1 person to start a fire“
The bad apple!
You need to go to bed because you’ve become quite incoherent.
Oh good lordAnd I dumbed it down for you in each of the next two posts: hundreds of people occupying the same area where a fire happened the day before does not make all of them the arsonist(s) to a sufficient degree of certainty to justify government violence.
I am again at a loss for why you would advertise your inability to grasp these simple concepts. However, the fact that you think this dumbass discussion is an improvement over your earlier argument is sufficient acknowledgment of that argument’s stupidity for me.
Go to bed bro. You’re angry and probably drunk because you literally cannot even read
Yeah the fire happened the day before, that’s why Trump walked over to the Church. Thank you Captain ObviousOh I’m sorry, was there some fine print after “lOl yOu SaID bAD aPpLe,” that established the relevance of a fire that happened the day before? Yeah, I guess I’m incoherently drunk because all I see is somebody trying as hard as they can to talk about anything other than that.