George Floyd Protest/Riots

#3,901
#3,901
DynaLo said:
Tucker did Trump a solid with that 30 minutes.

1) he puts it all on Jared, who nobody really likes or trusts anyhow and the Trump base now gets to say, see it’s been Jared screwing things up all along. Circle the wagons around Trump.
2) he got a message across to Trump that Jared is more hurt than help with the base and he needs curb kicked
3) Trump now has a legitimate, nationally broadcast, reason to put Jared back in the closet that the family can’t argue with due to the upcoming election

It got me wondering since Tucker was originally so close to Trump, has Jared’s recent increased involvement in all things included locking out certain folks Trump used to be more involved with? Why else would Tucker mention folks being hand picked by Jared? Or, see item 3. Which brings up the question, was this planned out between Trump and Tucker?😂
Click to expand...

Jared has always creeped me out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol, DynaLo and StarRaider
#3,903
#3,903
GoBigOrangeUT said:
Pretty sure getting smoke in your eyes is irritating, and the fact the park police didn’t know the POTUS wasn’t coming through is hilariously stupid.
Click to expand...

The implication that the park police wouldn’t have cleared the square before Trump walked across it or that they would have been told literally seconds before to do it is ridiculous. They literally cleared the square minutes before Trump walked across it.

That is some Grade-A BS.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mr.checkerboards
#3,905
#3,905
hog88 said:
And I’m saying our soldiers would be under the same ridiculous orders.

You’d be putting them in an impossible situation.
Click to expand...

This is correct.

And consider everything else that comes with this as well. If the military hits the streets, our rights are effectively suspended. Our rights are essentially determined ad hoc by the military in any location. There will be curfews in areas that extend far outside the 'problem areas'. Those that carry guns lawfully will not be able to do so. There will be checkpoints anywhere the military deems necessary which will become more than just a minor inconvenience. And when law-abiding citizens are ready for the military to end the effort but the effort persists, you can hang up the right to peacefully assemble because that option is off the table. Everything will be disrupted in a way similar or worse than COVID-19 and without the freedoms we enjoyed previously. Who wants to set this precedent in a modern society?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88, marcusluvsvols and tennvols77
#3,910
#3,910
Offset Eye said:
This is correct.

And consider everything else that comes with this as well. If the military hits the streets, our rights are effectively suspended. Our rights are essentially determined ad hoc by the military in any location. There will be curfews in areas that extend far outside the 'problem areas'. Those that carry guns lawfully will not be able to do so. There will be checkpoints anywhere the military deems necessary which will become more than just a minor inconvenience. And when law-abiding citizens are ready for the military to end the effort but the effort persists, you can hang up the right to peacefully assemble because that option is off the table. Everything will be disrupted in a way similar or worse than COVID-19 and without the freedoms we enjoyed previously. Who wants to set this precedent in a modern society?
Click to expand...
Which is what the Blur states want. So when November comes they can be like hey remember when Trump did this or that.
With that being said I'm for using them if nessecarry but it's a slippery slope
 
#3,913
#3,913
Purple Tiger said:
Yeah, let them continue to shoot innocent bystanders, store owners and any f'ing one they take a mind to. That's all we need.
Click to expand...

Verses ? Shooting cops, allowing looters to shoot/attack store owners protecting their property, allowing illegal destruction of property via planned riots that are hijacking a would be meaningful protest ???
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood, tennvols77 and Tennesseefan2019
#3,922
#3,922
Purple Tiger said:
Yeah, let them continue to shoot innocent bystanders, store owners and any f'ing one they take a mind to. That's all we need.
Click to expand...

I don’t think anyone is arguing to shoot innocent people at all. But there is video, and plenty of it, of rioters/Antifa committing assault and battery of individuals, vandalizing and stealing. All of which are crimes. If they continue, it’s going to happen and it will be their own fault. The fact the left is giving them a complete pass and saying hands off no matter what is absurd
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and W.TN.Orange Blood
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top