George Floyd Protest/Riots

#2,601
#2,601
Septic said:
I don't disagree, but you're trying to rationalize the group think of seriously pissed off people. There are posters here that are trivializing their plight and even suggesting that racism doesn't exist, and few have even called them out.

I've already stated that I don't condone their behaviour, but I understand it. Whether you agree with it or not, the dialogue is being had and folks are definitely paying attention.
Click to expand...

“ Behaviour” ..Nice trap
 
#2,602
#2,602
LouderVol said:
For most buildings a smashed window comes out of the owners pocket and not the tenant. Most exterior damage will be that way. At least here in the south where I have worked.

If they are renting those ruined businesses means the owner of the building, also a business, is losing money. Any damage now makes them less likely to reinvest later.

Unless you are just pointing the absurditiy of the looters physically running away with the building itself.
Click to expand...

It's likely that the insured building and business owners will pay their deductible and receive recovery for any physical damage to real or personal property in addition to the loss of income (including rental income) from the time of the loss through the period of restoration.

People can be all butthurt about the busted up buildings, but te insurance company's will stroke the check and move on.
 
#2,603
#2,603
Septic said:
Yes, exactly like those people in Michigan. Imagine these cats getting labeled as terrorists for 'storming the capital with guns'.



As far as I know, trump only want them labeled as terrorists. To my understanding, that's enough - at least it was when Obama droned that guy in Assholeistan. Though, he's fond of the executive order - so maybe that's his play? Hard to know, he's bunkered down - hiding and tweeting about how other people should be tougher.
Click to expand...
funny how you are so bothered by peaceful protests because they are Rs and white. Yet have no problem when libs and blacks burn cities to the ground
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paper_Towel, SlipKidVol, CagleMtnVol and 1 other person
#2,606
#2,606
Septic said:
It's likely that the insured building and business owners will pay their deductible and receive recovery for any physical damage to real or personal property in addition to the loss of income (including rental income) from the time of the loss through the period of restoration.

People can be all butthurt about the busted up buildings, but te insurance company's will stroke the check and move on.
Click to expand...

And all of us policy holders get to pay higher rates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ETV and 0nelilreb
#2,608
#2,608
VolStrom said:
Hitler! There we go, the radical left has resorted to the Nazi claims.
Click to expand...

I'm expecting PJ to come here and point out that the left is using names like grammar Hitler to provoke the right into a discussion that will fuel only more resentment towards one another.
 
#2,611
#2,611
VolStrom said:
Hitler! There we go, the radical left has resorted to the Nazi claims.
Click to expand...

Grammar nazi is a pretty ubiquitous phrasing for chest thumpers who correct others spelling or grammar on internet forums.

That you try to tie that to being called "Nazi's" for any other reason is beneath you.
 
#2,612
#2,612
No surprises here, but it appears that the independent autopsy results are completely opposite to the ME autopsy report.
 
#2,615
#2,615
Septic said:
Grammar nazi is a pretty ubiquitous phrasing for chest thumpers who correct others spelling or grammar on internet forums.

That you try to tie that to being called "Nazi's" for any other reason is beneath you.
Click to expand...
You've lost you're sense of humor. I guess your getting beaten down on two hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paper_Towel, volinsd, TrumpedUpVol and 3 others
#2,616
#2,616
allvol123 said:
I asked for an example prior to 2016 and you failed because your original statement was idiotic bs.
Click to expand...
That is a ridiculous request for a network which has only been around for about 25 years. My statement that such criticism of the government is not tolerated in a communist society is accurate. Those of you on the right who refer to American journalists as "communists" are the idiots.... you simply don't understand what communism entails.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
#2,617
#2,617
BowlBrother85 said:
That is a ridiculous request for a network which has only been around for about 25 years. My statement that such criticism of the government is not tolerated in a communist society is accurate. Those of you on the right who refer to American journalists as "communists" are the idiots.... you simply don't understand what communism entails.
Click to expand...

It was a ridiculous request for you to back up your claim. Indeed.

It entails controlling the message.
 
#2,622
#2,622
allvol123 said:
It was a ridiculous request for you to back up your claim. Indeed.

It entails controlling the message.
Click to expand...
Who do you think it was that broke the Monica Lewinsky story? The Washington Post (Michael Isikoff). Such disclosures from investigative reporting do not happen under a communist regime. That was the point. It was never specific to just one outlet.
 
#2,625
#2,625
BowlBrother85 said:
Who do you think it was that broke the Monica Lewinsky story? The Washington Post (Michael Isikoff). Such disclosures from investigative reporting do not happen under a communist regime. That was the point. It was never specific to just one outlet.
Click to expand...

And I guess they wrote repeated pieces for his removal? Got it.

Next time, dont make stupid claims and you wont look so stupid.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top