evillawyer
Have No God Before His Orangeness
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 33,401
- Likes
- 21,855
What a truly bizarre statement this is. You may not like the reporting of such media outlets as MSNBC, CNN, The Washington Post and The New York Times, but you can't intelligently argue that they in any way favor communism. Such sources of news can simply not exist wherever communism exists. A free and independent press does not have a history in Russia, for example. Control of the media dates back to the very beginning of the Soviet Union. Editorial commentary which is critical of the government has only rarely (during Glasnost) been permitted. The government controls rights to licensing and the financing of newspapers. Appointments to high-level media jobs, such as editors, is controlled by the government. Indeed, Trump's threats of shutting down media outlets, his calling them "the enemy of the people" and his threats to censor them, are much more consistent with what you would see in a communist country. Editorial commentary calling for the removal of a president is something that you would never see in a communist nation - but you see it on MSNBC all the time.Communist indoctrination goes on in most of the journalism schools.
Can you explain the link between "don't tread on me" and "respect authority" and how it relates to and is controversial to you to not want rioters and other Democrat voters to stop burning down businesses and attacking people? You seem to really like it and I'm not sure why.Here's a video of you guys going from "don't tread on me" to "respect authority".
![]()
The media is dominated by the left. The NYT hired a member to the editorial board that said she wanted an entire race of people exterminated. They adore and defend China at every turn, so yes, they love communism...or at least they think they do.What a truly bizarre statement this is. You may not like the reporting of such media outlets as MSNBC, CNN, The Washington Post and The New York Times, but you can't intelligently argue that they in any way favor communism. Such sources of news can simply not exist wherever communism exists. A free and independent press does not have a history in Russia, for example. Control of the media dates back to the very beginning of the Soviet Union. Editorial commentary which is critical of the government has only rarely (during Glasnost) been permitted. The government controls rights to licensing and the financing of newspapers. Appointments to high-level media jobs, such as editors, is controlled by the government. Indeed, Trump's threats of shutting down media outlets, his calling them "the enemy of the people" and his threats to censor them, are much more consistent with what you would see in a communist country. Editorial commentary calling for the removal of a president is something that you would never see in a communist nation - but you see it on MSNBC all the time.
So, basically, your post was a very stupid one.
What a truly bizarre statement this is. You may not intelligently argue that they in any w them, are much more consistent with what you would see in a communist country. Editorial commentary calling for the removal of a president is something that you would never see in a communist nation - but you see it on MSNBC all the time.
So, basically, your post was a very stupid one.
I guess they will explain it to us at the next white people's meeting on how to suppress everyone that @Septic and others seem to believe we have every week.Da fug is booogaloo?
Attack a military member, you might just pay the price. As to the msm comparing that to Kent State, it would just further solidify in the minds of those alive during that time that the msm really are ignorant propaganda peddling idiots. Big difference with the relatively untrained for the assignment, jumpy and trigger happy weekend warrior guardsmen of old versus the combat hardened warriors in today’s guard.
Same way the KKK has so many Volnation members.How does one get to be a member of Antifa? Are there dues? Does one get a membership card?
Who decides if a protester is a "antifa" and thus subject to be prosecuted as a terrorist?