Iam4utalways
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2015
- Messages
- 13,528
- Likes
- 9,821
1) You can predict the future. Just like I can. We just can’t see into the future. My bad.1) I can’t predict the future
2) if a QBs throws for 400 on the road and wins conference player of the week he probably won you the game
3) we lost the BYU game because of his play
4)Maurers play at KY was about as bad as Peterman in 2013 in Gainesville. We wouldn’t have won that game without JG.
5) the original poster said JG won 1 important road game
6) myself....and several others have argued that it’s at least 3
7) you keep interjecting other facts into the conversation that I never brought up....and I’m honestly not sure why we’re still arguing.
....Just for the record. Scrub or no, are you arguing that the Missouri /KY games weren’t important????
2)Probably another QB on the team probably could have gotten us the win too. I’m glad he was able to help us win.
3)We lost the BYU game due to a late blunder by our defense. We were in a position to win. He helped get us to that position.
4)There you go predicting(That’s the cause of #1.) alternate pasts. Another player could have stepped up at QB if JG was unavailable. I’m glad he was and was able to help us win.
5)All games are important, so beating scrub teams on the road count as important too. But could we have do it without JG? We can never know.
6)It is 3 road wins. 1 against a real team and 2 vs scrubs. They are all important so by default it’s 3 important road wins.
7)You insist on saying we would have won without JG. Just like you say you can’t predict the future, you should say you can’t predict alternate pasts.
To say we wouldn’t have won without him is “exactly the same but different”, than being a fortune teller.
There is a chance we would have won even without him.