What is it I'm not holding him accountable for, specifically?
Actually you miss the point entirely.
You insist the two investigation into Trump & Co. were given the same
routine treatment as other, nondescript investigations NOT subject to the daily attention of every media outlet, politician, and citizen for three years, therefore subject to the same routine "sloppiness" as others. Just another couple "let's get a president" probes, subject to everyday sloppy errors.
You go so far to make the claim: "
Trump and his associates got treated the way any suspected criminal would be treated anywhere in America."
And "
Errors, like the ones in the Page application, occurred in every single case. IIRC, the Page app was even below average in terms of number of errors."
That's like saying stepping on broken glass three times is the same or worse, as stepping once on a claymore.
----------------------------------------------
The Trump investigations were NOT analogous, nor treated the same as the 29, and therefore NOT just casualties of routine sloppiness. At minimum,
IG Horowitz plainly leaves that question open, if not outright implying other motivation:
On the FISA side, we found, as you noted, a lack of documented testimony evidence about intentionality, but we also noted the lack of satisfactory explanations and in fact leave open the fact that, for the reasons you indicated, it’s unclear what the motivations were. On the one hand, gross incompetence, negligence? On the other hand, intentionality? And where in between? We weren’t in a position, with the evidence we had, to make that conclusion, but I’m not ruling it out.
That so many basic and fundamental errors were made by three separate, hand-picked teams on one of the most sensitive FBI investigations that was briefed to the highest levels within t he FBI, and that FBI officials expected would eventually be subjected to close scrutiny, raised significant questions regarding the FBI chain of command’s management and supervision of the FISA process.
Maybe Horowitz doesn't run **** through his brain before issuing reports and testifying to Congress, hmmm....
--------------------
Durham's investigations have prompted Barr's least ambiguous statement to date, echoes of IG Horowitz:
"My own view is that the evidence shows that we're not dealing with just the mistakes or sloppiness," Barr told host Laura Ingraham. "There was something far more troubling here. We're going to get to the bottom of it. And if people broke the law and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted."
Trump "has every right to be frustrated" by the investigation, Barr added.
"What happened to him was one of the greatest travesties in American history -- without any basis," Barr said. "They started this investigation of his campaign. And even more concerning, actually, is what happened after the campaign. A whole pattern of events while he was president ... to sabotage the presidency ... or at least have the effect of sabotaging the presidency."
----------------------
I surely have emphasized the illogic of your shifting, myriad points.
I'd cut back the amount of **** you're running through your head, lest you accumulate **** for brains.
