drvenner
#LiftUpEllie
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 44,822
- Likes
- 189,445
No way to know how he would have done. Pitchers were generally better in his era, but so were the bats. He also juiced. Who knows how much that helped him. He was a great all around player. Great OF and base runner. I still think he's far from the best hitter. I have bias against him because he juiced. I am likely letting some of that bias me when comparing him.How would Bonds of done in any of the eras you mentioned? He would dominated.
Even if his career proceeded at a similar trajectory as his Pittsburgh years he would still have been an all-time great and would have gotten to 500 or so HRs.
He also was great at every other aspect of offense during the first half of his career.