That makes absolutely no sense at all. You are biasing the data towards a higher COVID death total.
That possible CV doesn’t mean CV death. But it allows the CDC to test their models later. There are a lot of people dying at home without a CV test. Ideally their blood will be drawn for serology testing but I don’t know if that’s happening.
As for counting positive CV test deaths as CV deaths, it’s immaterial.
During an epidemic you can’t easily evaluate every death in detail from a CDC standpoint. So if you die following a positive CV test, they count you in their current statistics.
It is a minor bias that allows them to handle large amounts of information in a fast paced process. A bias that is likely overwhelmed by the deaths that are not being counted.
Mortality rate in the US is 874/100,000 per year. We’ve had 6 weeks of CV deaths. Assuming all 500k cases had CV that whole time and could have died of CV or other causes (very conservative because 400k of those have only been cases for 2 weeks), you would only expect 500 deaths non CV deaths. Instead we’ve had 19,000. That’s less than 3%.
If you do the less conservative math of 100k cases for 6 weeks, 200k cases for 2 weeks, and 200k cases for 1 week (better tracking case progression) that drops to more like 200. That’s 1%.
Making an issue of this is just a distraction. It’s immaterial and streamlines the process during the heat of the epidemic.