Recruiting Forum Football Talk II

Status
Not open for further replies.
We stand in the middle of pages of laws. Laws that are permanent and questionable to say the very least. Most with justifications that are egregious.

Guess I'm just surprised that it's temporary policies that have an actual safety concern and legitimate cause to return us to the American way of life, that's a trigger.
 
And it’s not about them ATTENDING. It’s the LEAVING afterwards and SPREADING by going to stores...thus affecting the lives of those who didn’t choose to ATTEND. No individual’s rights or group’s thereof supersede the rest of the population.

The people at the store went into the public knowing of the risk, though. Correct?
 
I love ya, Jake, but this is a weak effort. You could use this sentence to justify almost any response to an external threat, no matter how serious.
agree. then don't throw HS history/civics class lessons out there as a reason we should be good with NOT madating and enforcing shelter at home orders.

lol.
 
There is no way to be completely safe in a free society.

Are you advocating for giving the government the authority to suspend Constitutional rights for any situation they deem an emergency or threat to public health?
No...not for ANY. This qualifies tho.
 
The people at the store went into the public knowing of the risk, though. Correct?
a reasonable risk with everyone under the mandates, following the guidelines set out, yes.

that over a 1000 people broke the mandate and are out and about doing their own thing?...no....that's an unreasonable risk that I nor anyone in my family should have to take simply becuase these morons just don't get it....
 
That 1200 people had hacked and hawked all over each other and then certain members had went to get some hot dog buns? How exactly?

They entered the public knowing that this virus exists. They must also know that there is a chance they will be exposed to the virus in the process.
 
We stand in the middle of pages of laws. Laws that are permanent and questionable to say the very least. Most with justifications that are egregious.

Guess I'm just surprised that it's temporary policies that have an actual safety concern and legitimate cause to return us to the American way of life, that's a trigger.
gotta get woke....injustice everywhere. even when they're trying to prevent you from getting sick and/or dying, they're out to get ya. FL man showed 'em......
 
a reasonable risk with everyone under the mandates, following the guidelines set out, yes.

that over a 1000 people broke the mandate and are out and about doing their own thing?...no....that's an unreasonable risk that I nor anyone in my family should have to take simply becuase these morons just don't get it....

You dont have to take the risk. Stay in your house, have your groceries delivered. Disinfect them when you receive them. You have choices.
 
But you've given them the authority now. What if they decide that the opioid epidemic is a public health emergency that requires drastic action?
Depends on the “drastic action” you’re speculating. Checks and balances exist. Took a lot of wheeling and dealing to get checks sent out to the citizens. No one person or group thereof could enact it by themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jakez4ut
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top