0nelilreb
Don’t ask if you don’t want the truth .
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 28,322
- Likes
- 45,424
They are still pushing in advertisement drugs that will drop your immune system. It's sad.My family laughs at the drug ads because the side effects for one of them are exactly the same as the symptoms of that particular illness. We’re all like well duh, why bother and how would you even know you’re having side effects.
That was my take, he heard of a successful older well known drug during a briefing that might help and outted it.Sure, if it works then I guarantee you will care. Some of you will even say he was right, knew what he was talking about, and he did a good thing by mentioning the drug that he probably just heard of an hour before.
And how many of those people you live around post in the PF of VN? I know of 2.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone say they are more R than D .. I also would argue the Navy , isn’t the military arm you would find that true in .
I dont think that necessarily true. At least with how I was using it as more of a catch all "the government has suspended the rules" type of Martial Law.
With how much justifiable complaints about us locking too many people up in jail on a normal day this seems ridiculous. It's a state by state wide house arrest. Is there any precedence for this?
There are only a few people who would be excluded from the drug on a previous condition. It's a fairly safe drug. It can't be mixed with antipsychotics and certain heart meds. Xanax is out.
I have thrown out this fact to experienced engineers before and asking for a quick answer and have seem them go 9/5 x +32 (or whatever it is) in their head. lolLOL.
I had an inquiry from a Dutch company yesterday, looking to remove a few ppm of O2 from a small H2 stream.
They gave me the temperature as 278K. Had to think for a second... let’s see, zero centigrade is 273K if memory serves...
He shouldn't be penning an open letter. He should be working his chain-of-command. It goes against national security.
I guess this may have already been debated yesterday, but....
It's been "Fauci is an alarmist" vs" Birx not citing worst case numbers to create panic"...
So, now that Birx suggests our best case scenario may be 100 - 200 thousand deaths, is she losing credibility, or is this the new accepted reality?
maybe there is some ambiguity in her comments?
Dr. Deborah Birx predicts up to 200,000 deaths ‘if we do things almost perfectly’