0nelilreb
Don’t ask if you don’t want the truth .
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 28,325
- Likes
- 45,438
He does, as does Hannity. Only thing is, Maddow has been held up by people on the left as some paragon of intelligence and journalistic integrity, when in fact she’s just a carnival barker, like Rush, Hannity, Jones, and Beck.
Except none of those guys were Rhodes Scholars or have PhDs.
They're both leaders. That's what you're ignoring.
So your argument is it goes away bc we just want it too. Then I wish aids to end and cancer. Also, I want a million dollars.
We have the most cases bc we have performed the most tests.... he didn’t say we would be free and clear by Easter.... he stated it was his hope that we could open up parts of the country by Easter.... they talk and meet on this daily.... he decided the best course of action was to shut it down till the end of April.... This is a pandemic that has affected entire world the same way....we are the world's number 1 in total cases. So spin that. You bypassed trump's claim that by easter the easter bunny would be free to hop around as well as us Americans. Or 2 months ago it was all good. He knows the economy gets you reelected so he focused on that. Now hes like well ****, coronavirus is worse than I thought. He dropped the ball.
This is a forum first.Which one is the supposed leader of the greatest country on the face of the planet, and which one is the leader of 1/50th of that country?
That's a false equivalency and you know it. Please stop being deliberately obtuse. I can tell by the way you argue that you're smarter than that.
Or am I wrong about that, too?
If she had journalistic integrity, you would never know what her political ideology was through her analysis of daily news.Rachel may spin theories, but she has more journalistic integrity where it comes to citing actual facts. I get that the right hates her, but her team does solid fact checking.
I know a bunch of you just got triggered, but not my problem.
I hold both responsible for their behavior, not just one. Personally, I find it intellectually dishonest to be so dismissive of a governor's leadership role. I can't help but think you choose to do so in an attempt to strengthen your attack against Trump. I've said several times he's made some missteps. That's no excuse for the behavior of others. You're only wanting to spin one side of the story. That's self-serving IMO.Which one is the supposed leader of the greatest country on the face of the planet, and which one is the leader of 1/50th of that country?
That's a false equivalency and you know it. Please stop being deliberately obtuse. I can tell by the way you argue that you're smarter than that.
Or am I wrong about that, too?
Whats really upsetting libs here and abroad is that their people are the ones getting sick and kicking the bucket. They desperately hoped for a rural and small town plague, but they got the one that likes packed in morons. And now they are crying that Trump didn't tell them to be careful two months after the world and everyone knew to be careful. There are no city governments, county governments, or state governments that could have helped. It had to be Trump. They desperately wanted Trump. He let them down by allowing their elected officials to choose to do or not do their jobs.
Trump can kiss MI goodbye come November.
Rachel may spin theories, but she has more journalistic integrity where it comes to citing actual facts. I get that the right hates her, but her team does solid fact checking.
I know a bunch of you just got triggered, but not my problem.