evillawyer
Have No God Before His Orangeness
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 33,342
- Likes
- 21,834
Maybe, but it seems mystery severe cases and deaths would raise red flags, even if the cause was then unknown.It was here, people, long before any cases were identified as CV-19. It is in the general population in more numbers than can be reported. Some of us have already had it because, in most cases, the symptoms are mild and we thought we had a "bug", or a "cold" or the "flu" or had no observable symptoms at all.
Maybe, but it seems mystery severe cases and deaths would raise red flags, even if the cause was then unknown.
!!!!I got something in early January after returning from Northern CA with lots of exposure to large Chinese crowds (SF the week after Christmas). Laid out for a solid two days, but didn't feel 100% better for a good 8 or 9 days. Got tested for flu. It came back negative. Doctor said it was probably a (known) coronavirus. My two kids never got anything.
At least he could test a million. What has Trump tested, 11k? No matter how hard you try to disparage Obama, Trump is worse.
That is the only solace that I can take from this entire ordeal...I am deathly worried about my older parents and my sister who has been taking chemo treatments.Where's @kiddiedoc? If kids are not affected severely by coronavirus because their immune system is not going into overdrive with adverse results, would briefly suppressing adult immune system response be helpful? I'm sure it's a completely naive idea, but just wondering.
NOT ONE CHILD UNDER 10 HAS DIED.
Why don't children seem to get very ill from the coronavirus?
Where's @kiddiedoc? If kids are not affected severely by coronavirus because their immune system is not going into overdrive with adverse results, would briefly suppressing adult immune system response be helpful? I'm sure it's a completely naive idea, but just wondering.
NOT ONE CHILD UNDER 10 HAS DIED.
Why don't children seem to get very ill from the coronavirus?
If
It was here, people, long before any cases were identified as CV-19. It is in the general population in more numbers than can be reported. Some of us have already had it because, in most cases, the symptoms are mild and we thought we had a "bug", or a "cold" or the "flu" or had no observable symptoms at all.
r.
If you think it wasn't running through the population before China reported it, think about how reliable they have been about this whole thing.
In that time since the first real unidentified case of CV-19 and China doing something about it, how many deaths occurred due to "flu like symptoms" and blamed on, I don't know, the flu? How many cases of CV-19 were there before tests were developed to even identify, let alone name it?
After having considered the above, how many "infected" people with no observable symptoms, traveled all over, including the United States and Europe? As a result of that travel over the world, including its closest neighbors, like South Korea for instance, how many more were infected, showed no "observable symptoms, had a mild case of "the flu", or were hospitalized, or died before CV-19 was identified/tested for? Considering that this virus targets the most vulnerable, the elderly with compromised general health, how many died from reasons attributed to their health circumstances before CV-19 was on the radar? How many associates of the ill traveled in the general population as carriers before they showed any symptoms?
It was here, people, long before any cases were identified as CV-19. It is in the general population in more numbers than can be reported. Some of us have already had it because, in most cases, the symptoms are mild and we thought we had a "bug", or a "cold" or the "flu" or had no observable symptoms at all.
All this "general lock down" is probably too late. It might slow down the spread, hopefully it will, but the idea of "containment" has always been a futile joke.
The impact CV-19 has had on our lives is disproportionate to the nature of the threat and we have not reacted in this way in the past to any other infectious disease that I can recall. I can recall TB, polio, AIDS/HIV, hepatitis, Hong Kong Flu, bird flu, swine flu, any flu, etc.
I'm having a difficult time justifying the reaction and panic that the CV-19 outbreak has caused. Maybe if the death toll eventually climbs to a point that it rivals the diseases listed above, it might have been worth it, I don't know. I don't think we will ever know. If it doesn't, the powers that be will justify it by saying that their "responsible and timely action" prevented it from being worse than it was. If it does, they will say "we did everything we could but" . . .
Stop panic buying toilet paper.
If you followed the thread when it began, there were several articles posted showing this began late last year in China. The govt did little to combat it until it spread through the country. Probably out of fear of impacting Chinese New Year. Local officials weren't able to tell their own people about the virus without going up through health departments and govt bureaucrats approvals first. Meanwhile they were attempting to break records for largest food banquet attendance in the world.Beginning to believe this more and more. Over the past month I've had 2 different ladies in my office with this strange , dry cough that persisted for weeks.
The panic is in large part due to lack of leadership....when there are no reliable leaders, people are left to their own devices to figure out what the hell is going on. You have health experts saying 1 thing, and then you have the "leaders" saying it is a hoax and some in the media agreeing that it is a hoax.If you think it wasn't running through the population before China reported it, think about how reliable they have been about this whole thing.
In that time since the first real unidentified case of CV-19 and China doing something about it, how many deaths occurred due to "flu like symptoms" and blamed on, I don't know, the flu? How many cases of CV-19 were there before tests were developed to even identify, let alone name it?
After having considered the above, how many "infected" people with no observable symptoms, traveled all over, including the United States and Europe? As a result of that travel over the world, including its closest neighbors, like South Korea for instance, how many more were infected, showed no "observable symptoms, had a mild case of "the flu", or were hospitalized, or died before CV-19 was identified/tested for? Considering that this virus targets the most vulnerable, the elderly with compromised general health, how many died from reasons attributed to their health circumstances before CV-19 was on the radar? How many associates of the ill traveled in the general population as carriers before they showed any symptoms?
It was here, people, long before any cases were identified as CV-19. It is in the general population in more numbers than can be reported. Some of us have already had it because, in most cases, the symptoms are mild and we thought we had a "bug", or a "cold" or the "flu" or had no observable symptoms at all.
All this "general lock down" is probably too late. It might slow down the spread, hopefully it will, but the idea of "containment" has always been a futile joke.
The impact CV-19 has had on our lives is disproportionate to the nature of the threat and we have not reacted in this way in the past to any other infectious disease that I can recall. I can recall TB, polio, AIDS/HIV, hepatitis, Hong Kong Flu, bird flu, swine flu, any flu, etc.
I'm having a difficult time justifying the reaction and panic that the CV-19 outbreak has caused. Maybe if the death toll eventually climbs to a point that it rivals the diseases listed above, it might have been worth it, I don't know. I don't think we will ever know. If it doesn't, the powers that be will justify it by saying that their "responsible and timely action" prevented it from being worse than it was. If it does, they will say "we did everything we could but" . . .
Stop panic buying toilet paper.