Or because people dont feel sick, because they arent sick.
Option 3: let this run its course until the government can no longer endure, and then take aggressive actions entirely too lateThe choice for our leaders is going to be letting this run its course and count the dead later or take aggressive actions like China and now Italy are taking to slow the spread. Either will have negative effects just the question of which one our government has the stomach and political will to endure.
Not really. There’s nothing emotional about addressing the reality that personal accountability and responsibility appear to be sadly lacking in a large percentage of our country’s population. It’s a question designed to specifically address that issue.
I don’t know if you are trying to debate in good faith or not so I’m unsure if I should put in the effort to?
You can carry this for a long time without symptoms, testing people who aren’t sick is actually paramount to contain.
Also, look up the case in Harrison county, KY. Patient was presenting symptoms and the Hospital there told the CDC. CDC said he didn’t meet requirements to be tested. The hospital said F that, and quarantined him anyway. Eventually he did get tested days later and was positive. Great work by the hospital staff there.
In King county, WA the CDC declared the area an endemic and won’t be testing as much to prevent hospital staff from being exposed (because apparently the test increases exposure risk to staff). So they are treating patients with the assumption they have it, which is fine, but it doesn’t reflect as official stats.
Growth rate in confirmed cases is low. That isnt an assumption.
Yeah -- so really, the test only helps with monitoring the spread of the virus and determines if a person warrants prolonged quarantine. I suppose that in a critical case, a positive result might suggest the use of a trial antiviral, but that's not really in my wheelhouse.
As far as patient outcome, the test is useless. It's kind of like testing kids for RSV -- the treatment is supportive and based on symptoms, and a positive result doesn't change anything.
Oh, like travel restrictions starting in January?I'm as big a critic as any, but no president comes into office with a "plan" on how to deal with a new infectious disease.
What he's done since January is a different discussion.