Recruiting Forum Football Talk II

Status
Not open for further replies.
#92,602
#92,602
HankHill said:
I’m not saying he’s ass or anything. He’s just not in the discussion with all time greats like manning, Brady, or Montana. He could be if he could wins another ring or two. Is he more talented than one or even all three of them? Probably. But there’s way more than talent that goes into being in these discussions. I look at Rodgers like Shaq in a way. Physically you could make the argument they are the two most unstoppable players of their time but their success hasn’t quite match their talent level like it should’ve.
Click to expand...
Shaq underachieved? 4 Rings and left Kobe and showed he could win one without him. C’mon Hank. I don’t want to say it...but that’s a classic #HankTake
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoilVol
#92,603
#92,603
Smokeytom said:
Shaq underachieved? 4 Rings and left Kobe and showed he could win one without him. C’mon Hank. I don’t want to say it...but that’s a classic #HankTake
Click to expand...

Yea but he let his body get out of shape and his personality killed the lakers dynasty. He could’ve had 7-8 rings.
 
#92,610
#92,610
#Vol4Life1991 said:
People NEVER mention belichicks defense during the brady era. I believe brady has had a top 10 defense every year besides 1 or 2 seasons. Peyton only had 1 in Indy (they won the sb that year).
Click to expand...

This is false. One year i know They lost to the Steelers in 05 i think in the divisional round after getting a bye. Their defense was 2nd in points allowed. They gave up like 13 or less in half their games or something.

Patriots were ground and pound/ball control with good defense early in Brady’s tenure but the last almost decade Brady has been that whole offense. Outside of the moss rental, A couple solid slots and a whole lot of nothing at WR and RB. Gronk was amazing but was constantly hurt. He didn’t even play in the playoffs where pats won the Super Bowl.

You know both can be amazing QBs? Lol. You don’t have to put one down to compliment the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: titansvolsfaninga
#92,613
#92,613
#Vol4Life1991 said:
People NEVER mention belichicks defense during the brady era. I believe brady has had a top 10 defense every year besides 1 or 2 seasons. Peyton only had 1 in Indy (they won the sb that year).
Click to expand...
2006 Colts defense was epically bad rankings wise...especially against the run. Bob Sanders was injured the majority of the season and returned before the end. They did gel in the playoffs and were a major reason they won the SB.
The Worst Defense To Ever Win A Super Bowl: The 2006 Colts
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulysees E. McGill
#92,614
#92,614
HankHill said:
This is false. One year i know They lost to the Steelers in 05 i think in the divisional round after getting a bye. Their defense was 2nd in points allowed. They gave up like 13 or less in half their games or something.

Patriots were ground and pound/ball control with good defense early in Brady’s tenure but the last almost decade Brady has been that whole offense. Outside of the moss rental, A couple solid slots and a whole lot of nothing at WR and RB. Gronk was amazing but was constantly hurt. He didn’t even play in the playoffs where pats won the Super Bowl.

You know both can be amazing QBs? Lol. You don’t have to put one down to compliment the other.
Click to expand...
That last sentence is a real ironic statement coming from you
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paper_Towel, Big Orange#1, Brillovol and 4 others
#92,624
#92,624
Vols4us said:
ESPN wanting SF and KC in the SB. You can tell Seifert wants them by the way he wrote his analysis. Same old ignoring the facts on the ground to sell a narrative. Titans need to wreck their and the NFL's party plans.
Click to expand...

I think a lot of media and people set to make money of hype would want this matchup. I want Niners and a Titans but I don’t blame media/NFL for hoping for KC\SF super bowl.
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement


Back
Top