To Protect and to Serve II

He will defend the brotherhood no matter how damning the evidence is. I was under the assumption that back seat patrol car doors couldn't be opened from the inside, but when the person riding back there can remove handcuffs and fling themselves from a car apparently miracles happen.

not at all....show me evidence that an officer did something wrong and i'll 100% call them out on it...just like the Walter Scott case...officers who really DO break the law or violate policies bring shame to their profession, and i'll always call wrongdoing out.

The problem is that cop haters often overlook a few things to damn all officers:
- lack of knowledge about actual laws
- lack of knowledge about police procedures/policies
- or the simplest explanation of why incidents occur

if you believe that two random officers decided to publicly attempt a messy murder of a simple minded mentally ill thief by throwing her out of a vehicle (which has the distinct possibility of not killing her) AFTER they were escorting her from testing which would disprove her ridiculous claims, AND the witnesses from the roadway who were interviewed all were either mistaken or intimidated AND the officers covered up the SANE test by contaminating it after the liberal advocacy center helped them cover it up, AND doctored the video evidence at the jail and on the arresting officer's body cam, AND stole a tube of shower gel from the women's bathroom at the advocacy center to plant in the back seat.

You are right, that makes MUCH more sense than reality, which is criminals make up stories and attempt to escape a LOT, and sometimes officers let their guard down when they shouldn't because they are human
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Findings now under review after TBI probe of Collegedale Police Department's alleged traffic ticket quota system

Based on [his] discussion with Chief [Brian] Hickman, and at his direction," Heath goes on to list a six-point plan to improve officer performance. Two of those points stated that officers were required to "stop vehicles at any time, whether the violation is big or small" and to "not issue Verbal Warnings, and to issue Written Warnings as a minimum."

In a response to the entry, then-Lt. Darrell Hannah wrote, "I have made it clear several times myself that verbal warnings do nothing for our yearly stats."

He ends his response by saying, "If productivity remains low let me know and we can we can [sic] work on a strategy that will include the documentation on the employees yearly evaluation along with a recommendation of not receiving the yearly step raise."

By December 2018, the department then began directing officers to meet a minimum number of "enforcement activities" and "patrol activities" each month, the lawsuit states.

Enforcement actions were defined as written citations or arrests, and patrol activities included neighborhood, business and school patrols, according to a statistic sheet posted to a bulletin board in the department's headquarters. But what did not count toward "enforcement activities," according to the lawsuit, were arrests that resulted from 911 calls. For example, if an officer responded to a reported domestic violence incident and made an arrest, that arrest would not count. The arrest would have to stem from a traffic stop.

Officers who reached their set numbers were more likely to be considered for promotions, newer patrol cars or extra training opportunities, the lawsuit states.
 

Enforcement actions were defined as written citations or arrests, and patrol activities included neighborhood, business and school patrols, according to a statistic sheet posted to a bulletin board in the department's headquarters. But what did not count toward "enforcement activities," according to the lawsuit, were arrests that resulted from 911 calls. For example, if an officer responded to a reported domestic violence incident and made an arrest, that arrest would not count. The arrest would have to stem from a traffic stop.

Incentives drive behavior.

Pretty clever, actually.
 

About 15 years ago here in Chattanooga there was a guy in a bitter divorce. His wife accused him of rape on their 12 year old step daughter. The police told him they had DNA proof and the child psychologist said he did it. They turned their backs and he left the police station. He called his mother from the woods in Hixson near the old middle school and said he didn’t do anything but wasn’t going to jail as a child rapist then shots himself. turns out they were both lies. No DNA and no Psychiatrist report. and nobody held accountable.

Never believe the police
 
About 15 years ago here in Chattanooga there was a guy in a bitter divorce. His wife accused him of rape on their 12 year old step daughter. The police told him they had DNA proof and the child psychologist said he did it. They turned their backs and he left the police station. He called his mother from the woods in Hixson near the old middle school and said he didn’t do anything but wasn’t going to jail as a child rapist then shots himself. turns out they were both lies. No DNA and no Psychiatrist report. and nobody held accountable.

Never believe the police

Wtf
 
It’s very sad.
The only reason I know anything about it is because he was a construction guy I used to work with some

Nothing is worse than a false accusation, and no accusation is worse than that. People play with these things like it's nothing.
 
About 15 years ago here in Chattanooga there was a guy in a bitter divorce. His wife accused him of rape on their 12 year old step daughter. The police told him they had DNA proof and the child psychologist said he did it. They turned their backs and he left the police station. He called his mother from the woods in Hixson near the old middle school and said he didn’t do anything but wasn’t going to jail as a child rapist then shots himself. turns out they were both lies. No DNA and no Psychiatrist report. and nobody held accountable.

Never believe the police
How do you know what the police told him?
 
Except the guy really did commit the crime. This was no innocent person. He was a career criminal and heroin druggie who was trying to hide from police. I wouldn’t have stated the “might not make it” line but the rest of what they said is appropriate and legal. He killed himself because he likely had previous attempts due to his addiction and mental illness.

Well, then it's perfectly fine for civil servants to tell horrible lies.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top