Orange_Vol1321
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2012
- Messages
- 28,282
- Likes
- 42,512
That is definitely what we see in politics all the time. Both parties are guilty of it.You're absolutely correct. I haven't listened. Have no desire to do so. Im actually not defending Graham here. Im also not impugning LBJ or JFK.
I'm making an observation of the sliding scale of morality depending on the party affiliation of the person.
No consistency. No REAL dialogue. No attempt to consider the position of others. Meaningless point scoring and "winning" is what we're about now on both sides.
Rant over. I'll go back to stfu-ing and gtfo.
This is probably the best point you have made. Yes, Obama's embrace of Rev. Wright was very troubling and it took him a long time to finally denounce him... too long, in fact.And for two decades, Obama absorbed and thought highly enough of Jeremiah Wright's weekly anti-American, antisemitic, racist spew to raise his daughters in the good reverend's doctrine. Then publicly dumped him while explaining the optics to him.
Dude, that's not even a tie...
There's no law saying they can't exist; if you think they shouldn't, take it to the courts and try to change the law.
I'm starting to see the simplistic beauty of your belief system.
Trump knows that he totally has it backwards... the reason that Pelosi hasn't sent the articles of impeachment to the Senate yet (but she definitely will in January) is because she and Chuck Schumer DO WANT WITNESSES TO BE CALLED IN THE SENATE TRIAL. It is Mitch McConnell who just wants to have opening and closing arguments and then move to acquit. Trump's tweet is very disingenuous.
That's the quote you pick?Well, no again; that's in "the deeply flawed man" phrase and I made it clear I care much less about Trump's shortcomings than the leftists, and treacherous people in gov/media who had plenty of VALID criticisms of Trump to work with, but went full Stazi instead.
It was a dumb dig, I'd prefer he not make such comments, I think they're beneath him and the office. Other than that, I don't care; he's frying more important fish. I specifically compared his narcissism to Obama, now you want me to compare their "mean-spiritedness", too; to what end? Is this a point system and is there a curve?
"You got into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
I think that's beneath a president and the office, a nasty generalization about half the country he perceives as not voting for him, and whom he can't begin to know. Happy?
What exactly is your point?Who writes and has written the vast majority of our laws?
What profession has dominated congress for the last several decades?