The Impeachment Thread

[volfanhill]

I'm interested in seeing what the stock market does tomorrow.

Nothing. His acquittal is already baked in.

 

[McDad]

Queue the Barnes bashers

The team is young tho. Hard to replace what he lost last year.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

So can we expect the dimocrats to come to the defense of the Constitution the next time there is discussion on the 2nd Amendment?
Apparently now the Constitution is the end all be all with dimocratic party.

 

[evillawyer]

LMAO

 

[CagleMtnVol]

Trump was considered the biggest dark horse, un-electable moron to ever run at this point in the 2016 cycle.
So, I guess you never know.

He's about to get more votes than he did in 2016.

 

[1972 Grad]

Why did you think that?

I thought she was politically smarter than that.

 

[luthervol]

And this right here is why I always scoff at people that say they don't vote for the party, but vote for the individual. My retort has always been that they vote in lock step, as they are told. Vote for Republicans or vote for Democrats. The individual doesn't mean sh!t. You should vote for an ideology.

And you should carefully nominate the person to best represent that ideology.
And thanks for the acknowledgment.
Double or nothing on Trump losing in 2020?

 

[StarRaider]

BOOM!!!!!!!


View attachment 247235

Is this the recruiting forum?

 

[NurseGoodVol]

I'm interested in seeing what the stock market does tomorrow.

If it doesn't react, you know what that means.

 

[Orangeburst]

@1972 Grad

I was wanting a full process in the Senate. Since this is only partisan vote in HOR, I am thinking just motion to dismiss in Senate and be done with it. What do you think?

 

[Velo Vol]

Is this the recruiting forum?

Certainly not the basketball one.

 

[C-south]

Pandering is one of the things they do best. Both parties should have a panda as a mascot.

Or just use mayor Pete.

 

[volinbham]

First non-bipartisan impeachment. Sign of the times

 

[Zues1]

I thought she was politically smarter than that.

You over estimated her

 

[1972 Grad]

@1972 Grad

I was wanting a full process in the Senate. Since this is only partisan vote in HOR, I am thinking just motion to dismiss in Senate and be done with it. What do you think?

Motion to dismiss, and put it behind you, and move on. The more you stir in a pile of sh!t, the worse it stinks.

 

[Zues1]

Motion to dismiss, and put it behind you, and move on. The more you stir in a pile of sh!t, the worse it stinks.

Totally agree

 

[McDad]

I thought she was politically smarter than that.

Political dunces don't last 1000 years in DC like she has.

 

[VolnJC]

 

[luthervol]

She let the AOC crowd take control, they are now owned by the loony radical leftists

That may be as eerily bizarre for you to say as it is for me to have to acknowledge that the republican party is now owned by Trumpers.

 

[volfanjustin]

You over estimated her

I did too

 

[Mick]

He must be proud.

 

[luthervol]

He's about to get more votes than he did in 2016.

And even if so, it will still be a minority.

 

[Orangeburst]

Motion to dismiss, and put it behind you, and move on. The more you stir in a pile of sh!t, the worse it stinks.

Yea. I changed my mind as well. The Dems have the "I" on him already and if he is acquitted, they are going to say it was a political vote anyways. I can see both sides though.

 

[McDad]

First non-bipartisan impeachment. Sign of the times

1 independent voted yes. That's bipartisan, right?

 

[volfanjustin]

That may be as eerily bizarre for you to say as it is for me to have to acknowledge that the republican party is now owned by Trumpers.

I will gladly take a pro American pro jobs President over radical anti American socialists