The Impeachment Thread

#27,276
#27,276
1972 Grad said:
I was 30 years old forty years ago, and I don't recall anyone calling for unlimited illegal immigration, abolishing all college debt, free college for everyone, Medicare for all, abolishment of the 2nd Amendment, free healthcare for illegals, abortion at 9 months and beyond, not allowing free speech on campus, etc. This has all come along in the last 40 years, so I would say 79 is right.
Click to expand...
70 year olds have had that same sentiment throughout history. Change (progress) is harder for some than others.
“The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.”

― Socrates
 
  • Like
Reactions: PointGuard and tvolsfan
#27,280
#27,280
PointGuard said:
Hard to respect a self serving President who puts his interests ahead of our national security and the Condtitution, who makes a mockery of our country to other world wide leaders, who tolerates the money and oil of the Saudis while hating the brown skin of South Americans, Mexicans and Muslims because they back doored a bailout of 666 Fifth Avenue through Quatar, who admires dictators like Putin and Lil Rocket Man who dislikes women except for their genitalia, but

Don’t get me started
Click to expand...
Fixed
 
#27,282
#27,282
PointGuard said:
Hard to respect a self serving President who puts his interests ahead of our national security and the Condtitution, who makes a mockery of our country to other world wide leaders, who tolerates the brown skin of the Saudis while hating the brown skin of South Americans, Mexicans and Muslims because they back doored a bailout of 666 Fifth Avenue through Quatar, who admires dictators like Putin and Lil Rocket Man who dislikes women except for their genitalia, but

Don’t get me started
Click to expand...
bwaaaaa haaaaaa haaaaaaa
 
#27,284
#27,284
Thoughts?



I think this is wrong in that it elides what a court does in enforcing a subpoena and what Congress does in the impeachment process, but the main point remains--why, going forward, would any president feel obligated to comply with Congressional subpoenas that could uncover bad conduct in the executive branch if Congress has previously ruled that such disobedience is not grounds for impeachment?
 
#27,285
#27,285
evillawyer said:
Thoughts?



I think this is wrong in that it elides what a court does in enforcing a subpoena and what Congress does in the impeachment process, but the main point remains--why, going forward, would any president feel obligated to comply with Congressional subpoenas that could uncover bad conduct in the executive branch if Congress has previously ruled that such disobedience is not grounds for impeachment?
Click to expand...

My guess is that is coming from a lib or Never Trumper, right?
 
#27,286
#27,286
evillawyer said:
Thoughts?



I think this is wrong in that it elides what a court does in enforcing a subpoena and what Congress does in the impeachment process, but the main point remains--why, going forward, would any president feel obligated to comply with Congressional subpoenas that could uncover bad conduct in the executive branch if Congress has previously ruled that such disobedience is not grounds for impeachment?
Click to expand...

Wow. You really don't get the damage your party is doing right now do you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#27,287
#27,287
evillawyer said:
Thoughts?



I think this is wrong in that it elides what a court does in enforcing a subpoena and what Congress does in the impeachment process, but the main point remains--why, going forward, would any president feel obligated to comply with Congressional subpoenas that could uncover bad conduct in the executive branch if Congress has previously ruled that such disobedience is not grounds for impeachment?
Click to expand...

If you are only going to have one side of Congress as President, it's better to have the Senate. You can still get Judges Confirmed and block crazy impeachment acts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol and tbwhhs
#27,288
#27,288
evillawyer said:
Thoughts?



I think this is wrong in that it elides what a court does in enforcing a subpoena and what Congress does in the impeachment process, but the main point remains--why, going forward, would any president feel obligated to comply with Congressional subpoenas that could uncover bad conduct in the executive branch if Congress has previously ruled that such disobedience is not grounds for impeachment?
Click to expand...


 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol, hog88 and BigOrangeD
#27,293
#27,293
luthervol said:
I'm fully aware of the damage that Trump is inflicting. It was predictable from the start and only avoidable by having enough on the right choose country over Trump. That has been the biggest disappointment.
Click to expand...
You've never been able to actually point at any tangible damage. Gay kids were all supposed to die right? Stock market was going to crash right? Civil rights were going to be overturned right? Blacks enslaved again right? What else did you scared babies cry about that never came to fruition?


Oh..Russia..OOPS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol and BigOrangeD
#27,297
#27,297
FLVOL_79 said:
You've never been able to actually point at any tangible damage. Gay kids were all supposed to die right? Stock market was going to crash right? Civil rights were going to be overturned right? Blacks enslaved again right? What else did you scared babies cry about that never came to fruition?


Oh..Russia..OOPS.
Click to expand...
Gonna put ya'll back in chains...
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood and FLVOL_79
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top