The Impeachment Thread

#23,704
#23,704
Dims are so lame......keeping up with their different made-up lies & phony fabrications each day gets exhausting.
CNN and the DNC have to be working 24/7 to come out with fresh new lies each day.....w/no bathroom breaks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#23,709
#23,709
PointGuard said:
Sonfland’s Hill’s et al testimony to name two
Click to expand...

Which version of Sondland?

SONDLAND: I believe I just asked him an open-ended question, Mr. Chairman. “What do you want from Ukraine? I keep hearing all these different ideas and theories and this and that. What do you want?” And it was a very short, abrupt conversation. He was not in a good mood. And he just said, “I want nothing. I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing.” Something to that effect.

SCHIFF: Well, I understand that. But my question is, are you saying that for months and months — notwithstanding everything Rudy Giuliani was saying on TV and all the discussion with Rudy Giuliani — that you never put Burisma together with the Bidens?


SONDLAND: I didn’t, and I wasn’t paying attention to what Mr. Giuliani was saying on TV. (snickers) We were talking to him directly.

SONDLAND: Donald Trump never talked to me about any security aid ever.
volker-meeting.jpeg


volker-qpq.jpeg




volker-burisma.png


sondland-addendum.png


Notice the word used is "presumed".

This is a "star" witness? I don't know he's all that and a bag of chips for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed, W.TN.Orange Blood and BigOrangeD
#23,712
#23,712
37L1 said:
Which version of Sondland?

SONDLAND: I believe I just asked him an open-ended question, Mr. Chairman. “What do you want from Ukraine? I keep hearing all these different ideas and theories and this and that. What do you want?” And it was a very short, abrupt conversation. He was not in a good mood. And he just said, “I want nothing. I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing.” Something to that effect.

SCHIFF: Well, I understand that. But my question is, are you saying that for months and months — notwithstanding everything Rudy Giuliani was saying on TV and all the discussion with Rudy Giuliani — that you never put Burisma together with the Bidens?


SONDLAND: I didn’t, and I wasn’t paying attention to what Mr. Giuliani was saying on TV. (snickers) We were talking to him directly.

SONDLAND: Donald Trump never talked to me about any security aid ever.
volker-meeting.jpeg


volker-qpq.jpeg




volker-burisma.png


sondland-addendum.png


Notice the word used is "presumed".

This is a "star" witness? I don't know he's all that and a bag of chips for you.
Click to expand...

Who decided to withhold the Ukraine $? Who's the one who ultimately calls all the shots? Who's lawyer said he was in Ukraine "on behalf of my client"?

You really gonna test the somebody-else-did-this theory?

So disingenuous. I'm beginning to understand how even Richard Nixon had 25% support of the public before resigning.
 
#23,713
#23,713
MontyPython said:
Who decided to withhold the Ukraine $? Who's the one who ultimately calls all the shots? Who's lawyer said he was in Ukraine "on behalf of my client"?

You really gonna test the somebody-else-did-this theory?

So disingenuous. I'm beginning to understand how even Richard Nixon had 25% support of the public before resigning.
Click to expand...
Where's the testimony?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed and BigOrangeD
#23,718
#23,718
So Trump ordered the aid withheld THE SAME DAY he had the convo with Ukrainian president, and he released the aid AFTER he found out about the investigation spurred by his having done so.

I'm sure these are just coincidences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MontyPython
#23,721
#23,721
37L1 said:
Where's the testimony?
Click to expand...

Really, dude? Come on.

Where's Trump allowing the people with first-hand knowledge to testify? Bolton, Mulvaney, Pompeo.

If he's innocent, why wouldn't he allow them to set the record straight? You know the answer to this... you ain't no dummy.

Good news is we *might* get lucky during hearings in the Senate. Judge Roberts may rule that they have to testify.
 
#23,724
#23,724
MontyPython said:
Really, dude? Come on.

Where's Trump allowing the people with first-hand knowledge to testify? Bolton, Mulvaney, Pompeo.

If he's innocent, why wouldn't he allow them to set the record straight? You know the answer to this... you ain't no dummy.

Good news is we *might* get lucky during hearings in the Senate. Judge Roberts may rule that they have to testify.
Click to expand...
So, really, Dude, there's no testimony?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top