The Impeachment Thread

Dims are so lame......keeping up with their different made-up lies & phony fabrications each day gets exhausting.
CNN and the DNC have to be working 24/7 to come out with fresh new lies each day.....w/no bathroom breaks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
Sonfland’s Hill’s et al testimony to name two

Which version of Sondland?

SONDLAND: I believe I just asked him an open-ended question, Mr. Chairman. “What do you want from Ukraine? I keep hearing all these different ideas and theories and this and that. What do you want?” And it was a very short, abrupt conversation. He was not in a good mood. And he just said, “I want nothing. I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing.” Something to that effect.

SCHIFF: Well, I understand that. But my question is, are you saying that for months and months — notwithstanding everything Rudy Giuliani was saying on TV and all the discussion with Rudy Giuliani — that you never put Burisma together with the Bidens?


SONDLAND: I didn’t, and I wasn’t paying attention to what Mr. Giuliani was saying on TV. (snickers) We were talking to him directly.

SONDLAND: Donald Trump never talked to me about any security aid ever.
volker-meeting.jpeg


volker-qpq.jpeg




volker-burisma.png


sondland-addendum.png


Notice the word used is "presumed".

This is a "star" witness? I don't know he's all that and a bag of chips for you.
 
Which version of Sondland?

SONDLAND: I believe I just asked him an open-ended question, Mr. Chairman. “What do you want from Ukraine? I keep hearing all these different ideas and theories and this and that. What do you want?” And it was a very short, abrupt conversation. He was not in a good mood. And he just said, “I want nothing. I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing.” Something to that effect.

SCHIFF: Well, I understand that. But my question is, are you saying that for months and months — notwithstanding everything Rudy Giuliani was saying on TV and all the discussion with Rudy Giuliani — that you never put Burisma together with the Bidens?


SONDLAND: I didn’t, and I wasn’t paying attention to what Mr. Giuliani was saying on TV. (snickers) We were talking to him directly.

SONDLAND: Donald Trump never talked to me about any security aid ever.
volker-meeting.jpeg


volker-qpq.jpeg




volker-burisma.png


sondland-addendum.png


Notice the word used is "presumed".

This is a "star" witness? I don't know he's all that and a bag of chips for you.

Who decided to withhold the Ukraine $? Who's the one who ultimately calls all the shots? Who's lawyer said he was in Ukraine "on behalf of my client"?

You really gonna test the somebody-else-did-this theory?

So disingenuous. I'm beginning to understand how even Richard Nixon had 25% support of the public before resigning.
 
Who decided to withhold the Ukraine $? Who's the one who ultimately calls all the shots? Who's lawyer said he was in Ukraine "on behalf of my client"?

You really gonna test the somebody-else-did-this theory?

So disingenuous. I'm beginning to understand how even Richard Nixon had 25% support of the public before resigning.
Where's the testimony?
 
So Trump ordered the aid withheld THE SAME DAY he had the convo with Ukrainian president, and he released the aid AFTER he found out about the investigation spurred by his having done so.

I'm sure these are just coincidences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MontyPython
Where's the testimony?

Really, dude? Come on.

Where's Trump allowing the people with first-hand knowledge to testify? Bolton, Mulvaney, Pompeo.

If he's innocent, why wouldn't he allow them to set the record straight? You know the answer to this... you ain't no dummy.

Good news is we *might* get lucky during hearings in the Senate. Judge Roberts may rule that they have to testify.
 
Really, dude? Come on.

Where's Trump allowing the people with first-hand knowledge to testify? Bolton, Mulvaney, Pompeo.

If he's innocent, why wouldn't he allow them to set the record straight? You know the answer to this... you ain't no dummy.

Good news is we *might* get lucky during hearings in the Senate. Judge Roberts may rule that they have to testify.
So, really, Dude, there's no testimony?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
Advertisement

Back
Top