The Impeachment Thread

#22,552
#22,552
ClearwaterVol said:
Trump has dumbed down the republican party. Now conservatives seem to think that by calling a political foe some "clever" name they have won the debate. The little nicknames are really pathetic. It is going to hurt the party for years to come.
Click to expand...

You’re correct but the left already claimed the nicknames “racist” “homophobe” and white nationalist for their political foes. Had to make up some new ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1972 Grad, SpaceCoastVol, hjeagle1vol and 2 others
#22,554
#22,554
ClearwaterVol said:
Wasn't he the attorney general or some such equivalent?
Click to expand...
Prosecutor general. He held the role for barely over a year. Given the corruption in Ukraine I’m sure there were others before him seemed to be corrupt so why him? Don’t get me wrong. Just like I say with Trump, there has to be concrete proof of a crime or else there shouldn’t be any repercussions. So far I haven’t seen anything concrete but I also haven’t kept up with 100%. So far I’ve only seen conjecture.
 
#22,555
#22,555
RockyTop85 said:
Would you let that guy testify before Congress if he was your client? Either SDNY is willing to deal in exchange for his cooperation with congress or his attorney is gonna land his client a fat malpractice judgment.
Click to expand...

This stinks to high heavens. Wouldn't touch it ... unless he's got receipts in the form of audio or video.
 
#22,557
#22,557
Report: Hunter Biden-Linked Firm Received $130 Million in Federal Bailout Loans

The Washington Examiner reported Thursday that Rosemont Capital, a company led by Hunter Biden’s business partners, received $130 million in federal bailout loans while Joe Biden was in office as vice president in 2009.

An investment firm linked to Hunter Biden received over $130 million in federal bailout loans while his father Joe Biden was vice president and routed profits through a subsidiary in the Cayman Islands, according to federal banking and corporate records reviewed by the Washington Examiner.

Rosemont Capital, an investment firm at the center of Hunter Biden’s much-scrutinized financial network, was one of the companies approved to participate in the 2009 federal loan program known as the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF.

Biden, Heinz, and Archer incorporated Rosemont Seneca Partners in Delaware on June 25, 2009. The “alternative investment and market advisory firm” was an offshoot of Rosemont Capital, which held a 50% stake in the new venture. Rosemont Seneca and Rosemont Capital shared the same office address in lower Manhattan and the same New York phone number, according to Securities and Exchange Commission documents. Three weeks after Rosemont Seneca was incorporated, a subsidiary of Rosemont Capital, called Rosemont TALF SPV, received $23.5 million in federal loans through the TALF program. This included $13.4 million to invest in student loans and $11.1 million to invest in subprime auto loans. Over five months, the company received a total of $130 million from the program in multiple installments for investments in subprime credit cards and residential mortgages.​
The timing is significant, the Examiner notes, because then-Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) backed the bailout: “He delayed his Senate resignation in January 2009 to cast his final vote to increase funding for the Troubled Asset Relief Program before taking office as vice president.”

Report: Hunter Biden-Linked Firm Received $130 Million in Federal Bailout Loans | Breitbart
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol, W.TN.Orange Blood and FallCreekVols
#22,560
#22,560
norrislakevol said:
Ummm no he didn't. The dems are still trying to actually make a case on hear say. It's sad and desperate and people are beginning to turn against the circus.
Click to expand...
Yes, he did. In the opening statement. Also, his account is not hearsay. Sondland definitively described the arrangement as a quid-pro-quo.
 
#22,561
#22,561
luthervol said:
You're a Trumper which means by definition you hate anything and everything democrat and will excuse your leader no matter what. Even with that fact, I know you must have a lower opinion of him today than you did 5 days ago; otherwise, you are absent any free will and thought.
Click to expand...

Nope and I could spin that right back around on you. You have bashed Trump the whole way. Russia!!! Russia!!!! Impeach!!!! Impeach!!! You must be absent of any free will and thought. You all fell for the Robert Muller embarrassment which was packed full of lies and falsehoods. You and your ilk have a very poor track record and it seemingly continues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#22,564
#22,564
BowlBrother85 said:
Yes, he did. In the opening statement. Also, his account is not hearsay. Sondland definitively described the arrangement as a quid-pro-quo.
Click to expand...

Absolutely not. He didn't prove shiz, just like all the other "witnesses" who didn't witness a dad gum thing. Gonna be awesome when this gets to the Senate. The the so-called whistle blower (who's not a real whistle blower), Four Pinocchios Shifty Schiff, and Hunter Biden all having to testify.
 
#22,565
#22,565
norrislakevol said:
Nope and I could spin that right back around on you. You have bashed Trump the whole way. Russia!!! Russia!!!! Impeach!!!! Impeach!!! You must be absent of any free will and thought. You all fell for the Robert Muller embarrassment which was packed full of lies and falsehoods. You and your ilk have a very poor track record and it seemingly continues.
Click to expand...
I have hated Trump since day one. I have hoped he would be removed by any legal means possible. Still do.
Fell for the Mueller embarrassment? What does that even mean?
 
#22,566
#22,566
norrislakevol said:
Absolutely not. He didn't prove shiz, just like all the other "witnesses" who didn't witness a dad gum thing. Gonna be awesome when this gets to the Senate. The the so-called whistle blower (who's not a real whistle blower), Four Pinocchios Shifty Schiff, and Hunter Biden all having to testify.
Click to expand...
Yes, he did. Sondland asked out loud if there was a quid-pro-quo and he answered his own question... and said that yes, there was.
 
#22,568
#22,568
luthervol said:
gas·light
/ˈɡaslīt/
Learn to pronounce
verb
gerund or present participle: gaslighting
  1. manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity.
    "in the first episode, Karen Valentine is being gaslighted by her husband"
Click to expand...
So if you know it means that, and I have not been manipulated......are you just batshit crazy then?
I see video of people saying they didnt hear anything except heresay...I see video of your expert witnesses saying they see nothing impeachable.
Maybe you should slow the videos down to 0.5% speed to make sense of them or something.

Gaslight my ass
 
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave and SpaceCoastVol
#22,569
#22,569
BowlBrother85 said:
Yes, he did. Sondland asked out loud if there was a quid-pro-quo and he answered his own question... and said that yes, there was.
Click to expand...

https://nypost.com/2019/11/20/sondlands-bombshell-turns-out-to-be-merely-his-presumption/

"Asked outright, “No one on this planet told you that President Trump was tying aid to investigations. Yes or no?”, he answered, “Yes.”

The followup: “So you really have no testimony today that ties President Trump to a scheme to withhold aid from Ukraine in exchange for these investigations.”

Sondland’s answer: “Other than my own presumption.”
 
#22,572
#22,572
Orangeburst65 said:
https://nypost.com/2019/11/20/sondlands-bombshell-turns-out-to-be-merely-his-presumption/

"Asked outright, “No one on this planet told you that President Trump was tying aid to investigations. Yes or no?”, he answered, “Yes.”

The followup: “So you really have no testimony today that ties President Trump to a scheme to withhold aid from Ukraine in exchange for these investigations.”

Sondland’s answer: “Other than my own presumption.”
Click to expand...
Presumption is not a bad word. This is what he interpreted his directives to be and he was a person of consequence. That is the same interpretation that Holmes also had.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top