The Impeachment Thread

Wow, Trump hired a lot of never Trumpers. Maybe he’s just stupid?

Which people that testified do you think were never trumpers? You’re making the assertion, so let’s see what you’re basing it on.

There is no basis for these claims other than the fact that principled conservatives are now persona non grata in the party formerly known as the GOP.

Now we have the Trumplican party on one side, which has no ideological bent other than Hail Trump; AND Democrats who are still deciding whether they want to be at the adult table or sit at the fold out with the Democratic Socialists.

We desperately need a third party for people who understand Economics, Science, History and International Diplomacy. Hell, basic math even. It won't happen though, because such a party would be too boring for the holier-than-thou victims, brain-dead boot-lickers, and virtue signaling shut-ins on social media.
 
Last edited:
There is no basis for these claims other than the fact that principled conservatives are now persona non grata in party formerly known as the GOP.

Now we have the Trumplican party on one side, which has no ideological bent other than Hail Trump; AND Democrats who are still deciding whether they want to be at the adult table or sit at the fold out with the Democratic Socialists.

We desperately need a third party for people who understand Economics, Science, History and International Diplomacy. Hell, basic math even. It won't happen though, because such a party would be too boring for the holier-than-though victims, brain-dead boot-lickers, and virtue signaling shut-ins on social media.
Trump is the third party. The anti swamp party.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
If she knew she had the votes before testimonies were delivered, what does this say about her (and your) understanding of the legal system and presumed innocence? Now, don’t backtrack to this portion of the process being a procedural formality, because you still have to get past the first part to land at the second. Remember, you said, “I don’t think there is any chance she launches this inquiry if she didn’t know with certainty that they were going to impeach him in the end.” How can you ascertain guilt on account of your dislike for someone?

The left is handing 2020 to Trump, and they’re too stupid to see it.
Maybe they do see but have to do it anyway because it is the right thing to do. Country before party, no one is above the law.

iu
 
With 50 Repub Senators on board, they could just dismiss. The 6 Dem Senators currently running for President better start blocking their early year schedule.
I don't doubt that Moscow Mitch would try it if he could. I don't believe it will get off the ground though. Justice Roberts will be in charge of the proceedings and I don't think he'll be on board with that.
 
I don't doubt that Moscow Mitch would try it if he could. I don't believe it will get off the ground though though. Justice Roberts will be in charge of the proceedings and I don't think he'll be on board with that.

On board with what?
 
I don't doubt that Moscow Mitch would try it if he could. I don't believe it will get off the ground though. Justice Roberts will be in charge of the proceedings and I don't think he'll be on board with that.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) also said as much in a March interview with NPR: “If it [impeachment] were to happen, the Senate has no choice. If the House were to act, the Senate immediately goes into a trial.”
 
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) also said as much in a March interview with NPR: “If it [impeachment] were to happen, the Senate has no choice. If the House were to act, the Senate immediately goes into a trial.”
....a trial that Justice Roberts presides over. Not Moscow Mitch.
 
The Senate simply taking a vote to dismiss charges. Justice Roberts would be in charge of the trial, not Moscow Mitch.

Roberts would have no say in the Senate dismissing the charges, he doesn't get involved until the trial actually starts. Besides Trump has already stated if impeached he wants a full trial in the Senate.
 
Roberts would have no say in the Senate dismissing the charges, he doesn't get involved until the trial actually starts. Besides Trump has already stated if impeached he wants a full trial in the Senate.

You think Rudy, Pomp and Bolton will come out of hiding and answer questions for the full trail he wants? Certainly he'd want to be fully exonerated.
 
Roberts would have no say in the Senate dismissing the charges, he doesn't get involved until the trial actually starts. Besides Trump has already stated if impeached he wants a full trial in the Senate.

He can try but I don't think it will work. The Constitution says if he is impeached he will be tried in the Senate. A trial with the Chief Justice in charge is constitutionally mandated. I'm sure the Dems will request an emergency ruling by SCOTUS if Moscow Mitch tries it.
 
He can try but I don't think it will work. The Constitution says if he is impeached he will be tried in the Senate. A trial with the Chief Justice in charge is constitutionally mandated. I'm sure the Dems will request an emergency ruling by SCOTUS if Moscow Mitch tries it.

It's a mute point since Trump has said he want's a trial.
 
Roberts would have no say in the Senate dismissing the charges, he doesn't get involved until the trial actually starts. Besides Trump has already stated if impeached he wants a full trial in the Senate.
Trump is playing with fire. He should take the win and move on
 
Every single person that testified that had worked under multiple administration said they had never experienced anything even remotely like the way Trump used Giuliani.
Quit normalizing this sh!t.
Lol... What else would a state department official say about a back channel communication? "Thanks for the help"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
Advertisement

Back
Top