The Impeachment Thread

#21,603
#21,603
luthervol said:
I'll amend my "proven fact" to "beyond a reasonable doubt".
Click to expand...
Beyond a reasonable doubt for you. That doesn't mean it's reached that threshold for everyone. But I believe it reached that point for you the day he was elected. And for some who support him blindly, it will never reach that point. Opposite sides of the spectrum.
 
#21,604
#21,604
Weezer said:
Beyond a reasonable doubt for you. That doesn't mean it's reached that threshold for everyone. But I believe it reached that point for you the day he was elected. And for some who support him blindly, it will never reach that point. Opposite sides of the spectrum.
Click to expand...
It was beyond a reasonable doubt for luther and the rest of the leftist mob back in 2016. They don't hear ANYTHING presented in testimony except BAD TRUMP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
#21,606
#21,606
Septic said:
He's trolling, no rational person believes that it was anything but a horrible day for Trump.
Click to expand...
Pitiful... do you not watch the news (Fox is showing the actual footage of Sondland's testimony) or just take calls from Schiffless.
 
#21,607
#21,607
SpaceCoastVol said:
lol. Keep trying to justify your TDS. You are a typical liberal. seeing what you believe.
Click to expand...
Great response, very substantive.

Yes I can see how my preference for free markets; individual liberty; limited, decentralized but sound government; and personal responsibility might make somebody like you believe I was a “liberal.”
 
#21,608
#21,608
C-south said:
For one she wasn’t president. Two, there was/is overwhelming physical evidence that proved her guilt. The real question is how is cankles still a free person.
Click to expand...
Maybe Trump didn't have any money to hold to persuade anyone to look into her? Because we know for fact when Trump has money for leverage he is very anti-corruption.
 
#21,609
#21,609
SpaceCoastVol said:
apparently not. He won. Remember?
Click to expand...
So did all the Democrats impeaching him. They also all won. So the last time America voted they voted in droves for Democrats. That's how they gained the majority isn't it? It was a free election where the people spoke. Does their voice count in that election?
 
#21,610
#21,610
Ty4Vols said:
Maybe Trump didn't have any money to hold to persuade anyone to look into her? Because we know for fact when Trump has money for leverage he is very anti-corruption.
Click to expand...

Hillary’s crimes and convicting her of them have nothing to do with Trump.
 
#21,612
#21,612
C-south said:
Hillary’s crimes and convicting her of them have nothing to do with Trump.
Click to expand...
But Trump is anti-corruption and Hillary was working with foreigners to impact the election right? So he had the right to bring an inquiry into her didn't he? I mean he wants the Ukraine to do one on the Bidens and you're good with that so you would have supported him asking for an investigation into Hillary right?
But he didn't so it's hard for me to believe he's anti-corruption when he didn't even have the person investigated that his crowds so famously chanted lock her up in regards to.
She was so bad and so corrupt but where has our anti-corruption President been in regards to her? I mean if having Ukraine look into the Bidens has absolutely nothing to do with the election then where is Mr. Anti-corruption on his requests to having Hillary investigated.
Trump said it is his duty to root out corruption so maybe he should be impeached for failure to do his job in getting Hillary investigated. Right?
 
#21,613
#21,613
The answers to those questions are right before your eyes. FYI Hillary was found guilty before trump was in office but the dims in charge chose not to officially charge her or try her.
 
#21,614
#21,614
luthervol said:
I'll defer to RockyTop and his claim that he's seen plenty of jury convictions on less evidence.
It's beyond reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...
Your team has no evidence... rumors, hearsay... lies, wishful thinking, hope... these are insufficient to get the job your team wants done. You are losers again.
I really wish you dems would put 50% of your hate into solving an economic, trade or immigration issue... you know, win one for the team (USA)!
 
#21,615
#21,615
What the Dems are doing because most ppl aren't watching the hearings is to try and win the soundbite game...they have done a really good job of it...leak the opening statement out to friendly media and then it gets lots of RTs and the retractions hardly get noticed...check this from The Hill...this makes it look like Sondland said yes there was a Quid pro quo...but left out the assumption part. Of course this was further disproven when the GOP questioned him
 
#21,616
#21,616
C-south said:
The answers to those questions are right before your eyes. FYI Hillary was found guilty before trump was in office but the dims in charge chose not to officially charge her or try her.
Click to expand...
I just want you to know how adorably cute it is when you and others write "dims". If there is one thing for certain the right does well it's creative nicknames and insults. I know you had to be mind blown with Trump's Nasty Nancy Pelosi. Wow, just so creative and imaginative. Who would have ever thought he would have topped Little Marco! The use of these little nicknames yall give out and use are just so darn adorable. Makes me just want to give you a big hug it's so stinking cute.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#21,617
#21,617
Ty4Vols said:
I just want you to know how adorably cute it is when you and others write "dims". If there is one thing for certain the right does well it's creative nicknames and insults. I know you had to be mind blown with Trump's Nasty Nancy Pelosi. Wow, just so creative and imaginative. Who would have ever thought he would have topped Little Marco! The use of these little nicknames yall give out and use are just so darn adorable. Makes me just want to give you a big hug it's so stinking cute.
Click to expand...

Thanks but I’m not gay.
 
#21,618
#21,618
Ty4Vols said:
I just want you to know how adorably cute it is when you and others write "dims". If there is one thing for certain the right does well it's creative nicknames and insults. I know you had to be mind blown with Trump's Nasty Nancy Pelosi. Wow, just so creative and imaginative. Who would have ever thought he would have topped Little Marco! The use of these little nicknames yall give out and use are just so darn adorable. Makes me just want to give you a big hug it's so stinking cute.
Click to expand...
Right. We know that the you guys would never stoop so low as to call Trump by nicknames like Cheetoh, Orange Man, Fat Bastard, Little Hands, T Rump, etc. or make fun of his weight, his hair, his skin color, his teeth, his eating habits, and so on and so forth. You guys always take the high road.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40 and VolnJC
#21,619
#21,619
Ty4Vols said:
So did all the Democrats impeaching him. They also all won. So the last time America voted they voted in droves for Democrats. That's how they gained the majority isn't it? It was a free election where the people spoke. Does their voice count in that election?
Click to expand...
Are we to assume any time a shift like that happens the voices are saying "impeach the President"? If so, government is going to turn into a reality TV show.
 
#21,620
#21,620
Here is the sad thing all you partisans fail to see, since Schiff and Nunes became the 2 ranking members \ chairman of the Intel comittee, everything coming out of there is a soup sandwich. I'm my eyes nothing that comes out of the committee has any credence. I felt that way during the Russia crap with Nunes in charge and feel the same with Schiff in charge and the Ukraine horse hockey. If I were Pelosi and McCarthy, I would fire them both and start over. The country is suffering because of these 2 idiots and you are too busy choosing sides to see the damage being done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40 and VolnJC
#21,621
#21,621
newokie03 said:
Here is the sad thing all you partisans fail to see, since Schiff and Nunes became the 2 ranking members \ chairman of the Intel comittee, everything coming out of there is a soup sandwich. I'm my eyes nothing that comes out of the committee has any credence. I felt that way during the Russia crap with Nunes in charge and feel the same with Schiff in charge and the Ukraine horse hockey. If I were Pelosi and McCarthy, I would fire them both and start over. The country is suffering because of these 2 idiots and you are too busy choosing sides to see the damage being done.
Click to expand...
Why is it being handled by the Intel Committee instead of Judicial where it should be? Is Nadler too clueless?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol and VolnJC
#21,622
#21,622
1972 Grad said:
Why is it being handled by the Intel Committee instead of Judicial where it should be? Is Nadler too clueless?
Click to expand...

No clue, but the Intel committee needs to get back to its purpose and stop with the partisan BS. We do not need partisan hacks in charge of that commitee.
 
#21,624
#21,624
luthervol said:
I'll defer to RockyTop and his claim that he's seen plenty of jury convictions on less evidence.
It's beyond reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...
Don’t defer to me, watch some of those real crime shows. Half of those are white washed to make it obvious and still have less proof than this.
 
#21,625
#21,625
RockyTop85 said:
Don’t defer to me, watch some of those real crime shows. Half of those are white washed to make it obvious and still have less proof than this.
Click to expand...
I watched The Innocent Man and was astonished at how innocent people could get tripped up during interrogations why I always told my students..never talk to the police
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88, davethevol and Phacerros
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top