Qanon -The Storm

If Gloria V is Gloria Vanderbilt, and since Anderson Cooper is her youngest son, CNN wouldn't have much interest in the story if she was involved with Epstein.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
What do they own that produces porn? And the parent company is Walt Disney.
Disney's not so Disney Interests

  • In 1989 Disney became a partner, and the one to own the largest % of shares in, Viewer's Choice "Hot Choice" - a leader in Pay-Per-View cable soft porn. Until Disney showed up, Viewer's Choice had only played action films and comedies. The profits were decent but Disney wanted better, and decided to launch the "soft porn" division in 1993. To develop original programming for their creation, Disney offered porn star Becky LeBeau a $7-figure deal and share of the profits. She appeared in many films herself and hosted an all-nude modeling program which showed explicit footage if women, some as young as 18. Disney also signed the infamous and famous Marilyn Chambers, a veteran hard core porn star, to an exclusive multi-project deal a year after she won the "Lifetime Achievement Award" from the Adult Video Association.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
I suggest you do way more research on this.

Viewers Choice - Wikipedia

ESPN had partial ownership way back in the day before ESPN was bought by Disney. And they didn’t make porno.

Hot choice was something owned by cox com and others not Disney.

Hot Choice - Wikipedia

There is no such thing as viewers choice hot choice
I suggest you leave this subject alone If not, you will lose all faith you have had in humanity.

It’s nasty and pisses me off.

Your google searches will not net you the truth.
 
I suggest you leave this subject alone If not, you will lose all faith you have had in humanity.

It’s nasty and pisses me off.

Your google searches will not net you the truth.

You may be correct but what aj offered as proof was easily proved to be false. Just an example of nonsense. If it’s true no need to make up, not that aj did, Viewers Choice Hot Choice. It’s not a thing. I did see some interesting things about porn sites violating Disney copy write protections that they have chosen not to attack. Which is surprising for a company that defends their stuff as much as Disney does.
 
Yea everything I read suggests you fell for fake news. I would highly recommend not using the Baptist news as a source. I mean come on. See my earlier posts. They combined two separate companies as if they were the same. There never was a company called Viewers Choice Hot Choice. ESPN did have a stake in Viewers Choice. A Canadian company that didn’t do porn. Hot Choice was another company that did soft porn. Disney nor espn never had a affiliation with them.

Do you really think a company, which is publicly traded and ran by share holders who only care about one thing, would allow something like that to happen?
 
Last edited:
Yea everything I read suggests you fell for fake news. I would highly recommend not using the Baptist news as a source. I mean come on. See my earlier posts. They combined two separate companies as if they were the same. There never was a company called Viewers Choice Hot Choice. ESPN did have a stake in Viewers Choice. A Canadian company that didn’t do porn. Hot Choice was another company that did soft porn. Disney nor espn never had a affiliation with them.

Do you really think a company, which is publicly traded and ran by share holders who only care about one thing, would allow something like that to happen?
https://www.multichannel.com/news/r...viewers-choice-will-take-lead-ppv-role-155944
With Board members being Disney representatives.
It existed, Disney was the biggest partner, they did porn. I remember it when it happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
Nice back track. So Disney had no ownership stake. They just had members of their board who were members of this board. Pretty common in business. And board members aren’t reps of other companies. They are advisers who are well placed to help guide strategy. You look at my companies board it’s a who’s who of influential people from all different back grounds. We got a WalMart guy. Doesn’t mean WalMart is supporting us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
I suggest you do way more research on this.

Viewers Choice - Wikipedia

ESPN had partial ownership way back in the day before ESPN was bought by Disney. And they didn’t make porno.

Hot choice was something owned by cox com and others not Disney.

Hot Choice - Wikipedia

There is no such thing as viewers choice hot choice

Don't be silly. The sheep have their false narrative and they are running with it. Facts be damned.
 

Apparently not.

Alex Acosta's decision as a US attorney in Florida to let Jeffrey Epstein avoid federal charges of sex trafficking nearly a decade ago has shadowed the Trump administration's labor secretary.
The allegations of sexual trafficking have been public for years: Florida state prosecutors charged Epstein with solicitation of prostitution in July 2006. Victims sued Epstein beginning soon after alleging he coerced them into sexual acts. Then Acosta's office declined to prosecute.
The details and Acosta's personal involvement in striking the secret "deal of a lifetime," was revealed by the Miami Herald last November.
According to the Herald, Acosta met privately and negotiated directly with one of Epstein's lawyers, Jay Lefkowitz, a partner at Kirland & Ellis -- the law firm where Acosta was previously a partner. Ken Starr, another Kirkland attorney who investigated Bill Clinton, was also recruited for Epstein.
After months of negotiating, Acosta's office declined to prosecute Epstein on federal charges of engaging in sexual acts with minors allowing him to avoid potentially decades in prison. In exchange, the financier pleaded guilty in 2008 to two state charges of soliciting prostitution, including with a minor. Epstein was required to register as a sex offender and served 13 months in prison but was able to work for 12 hours a day, six days a week outside of the prison walls.
In the end, the draft 53-page indictment was set aside and Epstein avoided all federal charges. According to the Herald, prosecutors had identified three dozen victims. The victims of his criminal acts were not notified of the deal until after it was inked.
 
ABC News' spiking of Epstein story draws scrutiny toward Clinton ally George Stephanopoulos | Fox News

However, what's really raising eyebrows is a 2010 report of a party Stephanopoulos attended that Epstein had hosted.

Page Six reported that the convicted pedophile held an event in honor of Prince Andrew, who was one of the high-profile figures implicated in the scandal, in his New York City townhouse, and on the guestlist were several members of the media, including Stephanopoulos.

694940094001_6100115071001_6100114268001-vs.jpg

The party took place after Epstein's 13-month prison stint for soliciting prostitutes under 18.

Despite having made multiple trips overseas with Epstein, President Clinton denied he had any knowledge of Epstein's alleged sexual predation. Strangely, though, it was reported that Epstein had a painting of Clinton depicted in the Oval Office wearing a blue dress and red high heels.

Stephanopoulos is known to be highly influential inside ABC News, but a spokesperson told Fox News he had "no involvement" in Robach's interview.
 

VN Store



Back
Top