Qanon -The Storm

Nice back track. So Disney had no ownership stake. They just had members of their board who were members of this board. Pretty common in business. And board members aren’t reps of other companies. They are advisers who are well placed to help guide strategy. You look at my companies board it’s a who’s who of influential people from all different back grounds. We got a WalMart guy. Doesn’t mean WalMart is supporting us.
So i backtracked by proving viewers choice existed and the link to Disney?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
So i backtracked by proving viewers choice existed and the link to Disney?
Viewers choice did exist. They never produced pornography. You backtracked by initially claiming Disney’s parent company produced pornography. A.) Disney is the parent company
B.) People on Disney BOG also being on a board of a company that produced porno is not nearly the same as Disney producing it. But again, Viewers Choice did not produce porn. A company called Hot Choice did. At no point were they involved with Disney either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
Viewers choice did exist. They never produced pornography. You backtracked by initially claiming Disney’s parent company produced pornography. A.) Disney is the parent company
B.) People on Disney BOG also being on a board of a company that produced porno is not nearly the same as Disney producing it. But again, Viewers Choice did not produce porn. A company called Hot Choice did. At no point were they involved with Disney either.
I'm sure you are right. They had no say even though eisner was diversifying their base.
 
Viewers choice did exist. They never produced pornography. You backtracked by initially claiming Disney’s parent company produced pornography. A.) Disney is the parent company
B.) People on Disney BOG also being on a board of a company that produced porno is not nearly the same as Disney producing it. But again, Viewers Choice did not produce porn. A company called Hot Choice did. At no point were they involved with Disney either.
I'm sure you are right. They had no say even though eisner was diversifying their base.
B39387AC-D584-4BDB-B740-66553BC92B91.jpeg
 
Disney must have new cruise ships that have about a 2 foot draft and can tie up to a dock 30 ft long.
It’s on their website

Disney Cruise Line St Thomas & St John Excursions

Captain Nautica's Snorkeling Expedition
Activity Type:Splashtacular and Family Adventures and Nature AdventuresActivity Level:ModerateDuration:3.5 hoursAdult Price:$75 (ages 10and up)Child Price:$60 (ages 8-9)Ages:8 And Up

Be whisked away aboard the captain's RIB power boat to a pair of sun-soaked snorkeling sites — and prepare for an adventure like no other. Journey to picturesque Turtle Cove, Buck Island and immerse yourself in an underwater wonderland, where you're invited to swim and snorkel amidst a school of sea turtles for approximately one hour. Afterward, make your way to your second snorkel stop — Little St James Island — where curious fish dart back and forth in the clear blue water, and colorful coral formations nestle next to amazing underwater formations. Afterward, enjoy a beverage and snack before making your way back to St Thomas Harbor.

Additional Information

  • Snacks and beverages are included.
  • Snorkeling equipment and instruction are provided.
  • Itinerary may vary based on weather conditions.
  • Guests will enter the water from the boat.
  • Guests requiring glasses to see will not be able to wear glasses under the snorkeling mask.
  • Approximate water depth at both snorkel sites is 10-30 feet.
  • Snorkel time is approximately one hour.
  • Although most likely, sea turtles at Turtle Cove cannot be guaranteed.
  • Guests are encouraged to bring sunscreen, sunglasses, additional clothing, hats, cameras and backpacks.
 
The Disney thing is odd. There is definitely a dark element behind the scenes. I went there years ago around Thanksgiving and was shocked at the number of employees wishing everyone a Merry Christmas. I would have expected happy holidays or something else instead.

Back to the porn thing..... Disney has been guilty of putting sex related things in their films all the way back to its beginnings. The Rescuers (a cartoon) has a short glimpse of an actual topless woman in one scene.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
The Disney thing is odd. There is definitely a dark element behind the scenes. I went there years ago around Thanksgiving and was shocked at the number of employees wishing everyone a Merry Christmas. I would have expected happy holidays or something else instead.

Back to the porn thing..... Disney has been guilty of putting sex related things in their films all the way back to its beginnings. The Rescuers (a cartoon) has a short glimpse of an actual topless woman in one scene.
That movie (rescuers) is also about child trafficking
 

Advertisement



Back
Top