The Impeachment Thread

[Septic]

What leads you to think he’s concerned about the deficit? Do you honestly believe expanding Medicare will lower the deficit?

I have no reason to believe that he'd be concerned with it, but I know what I've got with Trump - which is to say he's on track to exceed Obama's spending.

You may want to save your indignation for someone that may buy into the fiscal responsibility horsesht that the right tries to sell.

 

[tvolsfan]

Yes. It's all theater.

Think about it, if they removed Trump that would open the door for Pence, the mailman's son, Rubio, Romney and maybe Paul and who knows else. Want any of the Dem candidates to go head to head with any of them?

1. Nobody said he’s getting removed
2. Not impeaching him at this point is tantamount to exoneration. They wouldn’t go this far and then give him that.

 

[volfanjustin]

1) I'm not a member of either party. I would have voted for Menendez's opponent if I lived there, even if it helped Trump. Menendez might be the bigger crook of the two, historically. Trump has probably taken that mantle now.

2) Recent Republicans elected to statewide office in New Jersey. The GOP has been strong in New Jersey as compared to New York, but they are at an all time low there right now.

Chris Christie 2010 - 2018
Christine Whitman 1994 - 2001
Thomas Kean 1982 - 1990

I will give you Christie, but you are stretching with the other 2 especially when you have to go back to 1982-1990

 

[1972 Grad]

I have no reason to believe that he'd be concerned with it, but I know what I've got with Trump - which is to say he's on track to exceed Obama's spending.

You may want to save your indignation for someone that may buy into the fiscal responsibility horsesht that the right tries to sell.

There are precious few politicians with any sense of fiscal responsibility.

 

[0nelilreb]

????? Do you ever proof read?

Most of the time I don’t . You need me to say less words and space them more ?

 

[hog88]

1. Nobody said he’s getting removed
2. Not impeaching him at this point is tantamount to exoneration. They wouldn’t go this far and then give him that.

They're not going to take the chance of the senate removing him.

Let's look at this logically.

If the house has enough evidence (actual hard evidence) to impeach him it would put the Rs on the spot, they would have to remove him or face loosing the senate. The political ads would write themselves. If the Rs remove him they look like they put country over party and come out smelling like a rose.

If they impeach him over BS, no quid pro quo evidence ext then the dems look like they did it solely because of politics. They'll look petty and more interested in maintaining power than working for the people.

Nancy isn't rolling the dice with a general election coming up.

 

[volfanjustin]

Remember how sad they were when the Weissman report showed no collusion? Now how excited they sound since they think they finally got the President? That's all you need to know about the modern democrat/socialist party

 

[tvolsfan]

They're not going to take the chance of the senate removing him.

Let's look at this logically.

If the house has enough evidence (actual hard evidence) to impeach him it would put the Rs on the spot, they would have to remove him or face loosing the senate. The political ads would write themselves. If the Rs remove him they look like they put country over party and come out smelling like a rose.

If they impeach him over BS, no quid pro quo evidence ext then the dems look like they did it solely because of politics. They'll look petty and more interested in maintaining power than working for the people.

Nancy isn't rolling the dice with a general election coming up.

If you actually believe the bold there’s no reason to continue this discussion. The democrats want nothing more than Trump out of office as soon as possible.

 

[0nelilreb]

If you actually believe the bold there’s no reason to continue this discussion. The democrats want nothing more than Trump out of office as soon as possible.

That’s why there are elections 2020 is their chance .

 

[golfballs]

Siri, what does the phrase "moving the goalposts" mean?

He’s not wrong. If they’re going to do it they should vote. Doesn’t make it fair though

 

[1972 Grad]

They're not going to take the chance of the senate removing him.

Let's look at this logically.

If the house has enough evidence (actual hard evidence) to impeach him it would put the Rs on the spot, they would have to remove him or face loosing the senate. The political ads would write themselves. If the Rs remove him they look like they put country over party and come out smelling like a rose.

If they impeach him over BS, no quid pro quo evidence ext then the dems look like they did it solely because of politics. They'll look petty and more interested in maintaining power than working for the people.

Nancy isn't rolling the dice with a general election coming up.

Like I said earlier, Nancy is a very savvy politician.

 

[hog88]

If you actually believe the bold there’s no reason to continue this discussion. The democrats want nothing more than Trump out of office as soon as possible.

Why? You yourself say he is terrible, stupid, unstable and bad for the country so it seems to me that he would be easier to defeat in the general than a level headed establishment guy that doesn't scare people.

 

[C-south]

I have no reason to believe that he'd be concerned with it, but I know what I've got with Trump - which is to say he's on track to exceed Obama's spending.

You may want to save your indignation for someone that may buy into the fiscal responsibility horsesht that the right tries to sell.

So it’s more about hating a side that wants to be more fiscally responsible yet has trouble doing so versus the side that openly wants to spend us into oblivion.

 

[utvolpj]

So it’s more about hating a side that wants to be more fiscally responsible yet has trouble doing so versus the side that openly wants to spend us into oblivion.

They don't want to be but will keep repeating the claim until voters no longer fall for it.

 

[volfanjustin]

That’s why there are elections 2020 is their chance .

elections no longer matter, I hope like hell the Rs remember that the next time a dem is the president

 

[C-south]

They don't want to be but will keep repeating the claim until voters no longer fall for it.

Where are the necessary cuts to be made?

 

[golfballs]

This video.
“Does Alfred get minimum wage?”
“If you return the bat mobile will it pay for the green new deal?”

Lmaoo

 

[utvolpj]

Where are the necessary cuts to be made?

What doesn't need to be cut is a much shorter list

 

[evillawyer]

Discuss amongst yourselves

 

[lawgator1]

So it’s more about hating a side that wants to be more fiscally responsible yet has trouble doing so versus the side that openly wants to spend us into oblivion.

"that wants to be fiscally responsible yet has trouble doing so...."

 

[luthervol]

This denial is what makes your derangement even worse.

And you thinking them equal is what makes yours clinical.

 

[Septic]

So it’s more about hating a side that wants to be more fiscally responsible yet has trouble doing so versus the side that openly wants to spend us into oblivion.

Neither side has has any intention of curtailing the spending - the right has simply hijacked the narrative for so long that enough simps started to actually believe that the right is any different from the left in this regard.

As evidenced by your response, you've clearly bought the narrative that the right are better stewards of the nation's coffers. They aren't.

 

[C-south]

"that wants to be fiscally responsible yet has trouble doing so...."

Versus the buffoons you support.....

 

[C-south]

And you thinking them equal is what makes yours clinical.

They aren’t anywhere near equal.

 

[Stew Cook]

Discuss amongst yourselves

Without the Fraud Guarantee money coming in from Parnas, someone needs to fill the GOP campaign funding vacuum.