Amateur Hour Continues

Please explain?
Obama was a mediocre to bad president. But his mediocrity had nothing to do with his religion, his wife, where he was born, or whether or not he is a homosexual.

He was bad because he espoused bad policies. Focusing on superficial conspiracy theory rubbish was/and still is, a waste of time.
 
Obama was a mediocre to bad president. But his mediocrity had nothing to do with his religion, his wife, where he was born, or whether or not he is a homosexual.

He was bad because he espoused bad policies. Focusing on superficial conspiracy theory rubbish was/and still is, a waste of time.

nevermind
 
Trump's tweets from today BEFORE actually saying anything about 9/11. Stay classy Donny.







I find this amusing , now he has to have his tweets in a specific order or orange man bad . I’m curious , if the Dem candidate had of win North Carolina what would your first tweets have been on here ? Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol
I find this amusing , now he has to have his tweets in a specific order or orange man bad . I’m curious , if the Dem candidate had of win North Carolina what would your first tweets have been on here ? Lol


I think its that he woke up bragging about himself and engaging in his usual patter of insults and what not, rather than being a statesman and a leader, calling on our better selves by setting an example of focusing on that day over his own self interest.
 
I find this amusing , now he has to have his tweets in a specific order or orange man bad . I’m curious , if the Dem candidate had of win North Carolina what would your first tweets have been on here ? Lol
Yeah, CNN spent 7 seconds on that story. They were too busy lying about the spy that got out of Russia.
 
I find this amusing , now he has to have his tweets in a specific order or orange man bad . I’m curious , if the Dem candidate had of win North Carolina what would your first tweets have been on here ? Lol
I would have taken it as proof that Trump is toast.
I take the closeness of the race as proof that Trump is toast.
As always, I'm an eternal optimist. .
 
I would have taken it as proof that Trump is toast.
I take the closeness of the race as proof that Trump is toast.
As always, I'm an eternal optimist. .

And we both would expect EL to have plastered the thread with it showing everyone that it’s proof Trump is losing his voters in an important state . If you are taking the % of the R winning against the D as proof that Trump is toast , wouldn’t others look at it and say that’s about the % I expected and that Trump will probably win 2020 by ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
And we both would expect EL to have plastered the thread with it showing everyone that it’s proof Trump is losing his voters in an important state . If you are taking the % of the R winning against the D as proof that Trump is toast , wouldn’t others look at it and say that’s about the % I expected and that Trump will probably win 2020 by ?

Reporting for duty.

The Republican won the NC-9 by 16 points in 2016. That was reduced last night to around 1 or 2 points. That's a 14 point swing in two years in a solid red district. That's concerning for Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
And we both would expect EL to have plastered the thread with it showing everyone that it’s proof Trump is losing his voters in an important state . If you are taking the % of the R winning against the D as proof that Trump is toast , wouldn’t others look at it and say that’s about the % I expected and that Trump will probably win 2020 by ?
Not if they know how to read trends.
 
Reporting for duty.

The Republican won the NC-9 by 16 points in 2016. That was reduced last night to around 1 or 2 points. That's a 14 point swing in two years in a solid red district. That's concerning for Trump.
Iiiiff iff if ifffiff-ffifff

-Obama
 
Advertisement





Back
Top