Potential Starting Line up and Rotation 2019-2020

#202
#202
Im gonna tell all of you that being confrontational is not my intention.

Lets all be friends.

I just have strong opinions.

Now Ill just throw something out there for conversation sake.

I like Zach Kent's skill set.

If Plavsic is eligible we're apt to be strong at the 5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the_great_pumpkin and MinisterofDef#92
#203
#203
SweetDaddy said:
Im gonna tell all of you that being confrontational is not my intention.

Lets all be friends.

I just have strong opinions.

Now Ill just throw something out there for conversation sake.

I like Zach Kent's skill set.

If Plavsic is eligible we're apt to be strong at the 5.
Click to expand...

How do you like Kent's skills but not like Pember?
 
#205
#205
SweetDaddy said:
Pember is so thin I dont know if he could ever guard another post or get in position to rebound.

Could he shoot it a little?

Yeah but he'll get abused down low.
Click to expand...
Kent looks like a new born giraffe even after being in the program two years. Pember’s high school film shows he has a larger base than Kent.
 
#206
#206
SweetDaddy said:
Pember is so thin I dont know if he could ever guard another post or get in position to rebound.

Could he shoot it a little?

Yeah but he'll get abused down low.
Click to expand...
I think Pember's future is probably at SF, so it isn't likely that he'll be matched up in many positions where he'll need to. He has a unique skillset for his size, so it will be interesting to see how and where he's used, but I'd be surprised if the goal is ever to get him down on the block on offense or defense. I could be wrong.
 
#207
#207
Kent is listed as 6'11" 225.

Pember is listed as 6'9" 195.

By comparison Kyle Alexander is listed as 6'11" 222.
 
#215
#215
PG- James 30/Turner 10
SG- Turner 20/Bowden 10/Johnson 10
SF- Bowden 20/Pons 10/Gaines 10
PF- Pons 20/ORN 10/Fulkerson 10
C- Fulkerson 20/Burns 20
 
#216
#216
zjcvols said:
PG- James 30/Turner 10
SG- Turner 20/Bowden 10/Johnson 10
SF- Bowden 20/Pons 10/Gaines 10
PF- Pons 20/ORN 10/Fulkerson 10
C- Fulkerson 20/Burns 20
Click to expand...
PG- Turner 25/ James 15
SG- Bowden 25/ Turner 10/ JJ 5
SF/Point Forward- James 15/ JJ 15/ Bowden 5/ Gaines 5
PF- Burns 10/ Pons 10/ Fulk 10/ ORN 5/ Kent 5
C/Other Forward- Fulk 10/ Burns 15/ ORN 5/ Kent 10
 
#219
#219
The Dog said:
PG- Turner 25/ James 15
SG- Bowden 25/ Turner 10/ JJ 5
SF/Point Forward- James 15/ JJ 15/ Bowden 5/ Gaines 5
PF- Burns 10/ Pons 10/ Fulk 10/ ORN 5/ Kent 5
C/Other Forward- Fulk 10/ Burns 15/ ORN 5/ Kent 10
Click to expand...
They really need Plavisc to be eligible. The bigger concern is the rotation at the 1,2 and 3. Unless Johnson really steps up you are putting a ton on Bowden, James and Turner. That’s no back ups, just rotating around. Any injury would devastate.
 
#220
#220
zjcvols said:
PG- James 30/Turner 10
SG- Turner 20/Bowden 10/Johnson 10
SF- Bowden 20/Pons 10/Gaines 10
PF- Pons 20/ORN 10/Fulkerson 10
C- Fulkerson 20/Burns 20
Click to expand...
I hope you’re right on Pons playing 30 minutes a game as it would mean things were clicking for him. To me, Pons has the potential for the most improvement of our returning players. JJ second, and Fulky 3rd. CRB has demonstrated his development skills and we need at least 2 of these guys to take huge steps forward next year to have a good season. IMHO
 
  • Like
Reactions: MinisterofDef#92
#221
#221
Roustabout said:
They really need Plavisc to be eligible. The bigger concern is the rotation at the 1,2 and 3. Unless Johnson really steps up you are putting a ton on Bowden, James and Turner. That’s no back ups, just rotating around. Any injury would devastate.
Click to expand...
Some think they might use Gaines there instead of RSing him. Injury could be catastrophic, but we managed half a season with Turner not playing last season. Put s a lot of pressure on Johnson to put it together.
 
Last edited:
#223
#223
bleedingTNorange said:
Why are you policing him?
Click to expand...
Do you not realize how stupid this sounds?
It’s simple, talk about the subject. Disagree, fine. State your case, move on. But you are the leader of the Hall monitors. I’m just RESPONDING to the personal jabs, not initiating them.
 
#224
#224
SweetDaddy said:
Sophomoric?

Remember first that I havent disrespected anyone in my posts but maybe Fulkerson and Pember and all Ive done is expressed opinions.

I think that's what message boards are for right?

As far as my "sophomoric" takes Ill gladly put my basketball knowledge and resume against yours any day.

Like Ive said before Im not here for a pissing contest or for anyone to think I have special sources.
Click to expand...

Again, give your opinions and question the unknowns all you want...that is fair enough. However, make declarative statements about how bad this team will be before they ever play at your own risk. The simple fact that players step up every year for virtually every team (due to development & more playing time) seems to be lost on you. I remember the same type of definitive takes on specific players not being good enough to lead/contribute just in the last few seasons (Richardson, Punter, Schofield, Williams, etc...)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: walkenvol
#225
#225
Roustabout said:
Do you not realize how stupid this sounds?
It’s simple, talk about the subject. Disagree, fine. State your case, move on. But you are the leader of the Hall monitors. I’m just RESPONDING to the personal jabs, not initiating them.
Click to expand...
Need to stop being so EASY roust. Roll with it and they'll leave u alone. Boredom needs stimulation.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top