Hasn't Bruce himself taken responsibility for his actions? Hasn't he admitted he screwed up? I don't know all the ins and outs of the investigation and what Hamilton did or did not know. What I do know is in that situation, an ADs first duty is to protect the school, not the coach.Maybe (probably...) I'm remembering wrong, but didn't Hamilton know what the NCAA knew before they talked to Bruce; could've at least given the man a heads up. Sure, it's still ultimately on Bruce for lying, but with better communication he'd still be here.
Like I said, if I'm remembering wrong feel free to let me know lol. It's been a while.
I think a big part of the AD hating during that time was that the punishment didn’t meet the crime and the AD basically sabotaged the team and players and staff a day or two before our tourney game vs Michigan.
Hamilton was not a good AD for Tennessee for multiple reasons. But Pearl getting that team to the tournament was a tall task but big accomplishment.
Having Hamilton saying “ the jury is still out” 48 hours before the game basically ended the season and we got our asses handed to us by Michigan....
Would have been nice to have a competent AD.
That's maybe the most logical reasoning I've seen posted about why it could possibly happen. I still don't believe it, but your reasoning at least makes sense.
Hasn't Bruce himself taken responsibility for his actions? Hasn't he admitted he screwed up? I don't know all the ins and outs of the investigation and what Hamilton did or did not know. What I do know is in that situation, an ADs first duty is to protect the school, not the coach.
Would sharing that information have been a NCAA violation? What exactly was Hamilton allowed to share? I don't know myself, but as I said previously, the first priority for ANY AD is protecting the school.No Hamilton didn't. But he did have knowledge of the photo prior to pearls meeting with the NCAA and didn't tell Pearl about it. If he'd have shared that info with Pearl, Pearl would not in all likelihood lied. Doesn't excuse pearl but also does sort of paint the situation in a different light.
Would sharing that information have been a NCAA violation? What exactly was Hamilton allowed to share? I don't know myself, but as I said previously, the first priority for ANY AD is protecting the school.
Would sharing that information have been a NCAA violation? What exactly was Hamilton allowed to share? I don't know myself, but as I said previously, the first priority for ANY AD is protecting the school.
Good question but I would think he should be allowed to view any evidence against him prior to being questioned. Even off the record. Hamilton set him up in my opinion and from what I've been told.Would sharing that information have been a NCAA violation? What exactly was Hamilton allowed to share? I don't know myself, but as I said previously, the first priority for ANY AD is protecting the school.
So what if UCLA doesn't offer Barnes the job, isn’t that an awkward situation for him and Tennessee fans seeing that apparently Barnes would accept if offered
