Dems won't let Fox News host primary debate

It all depends on what the meaning of is is, and if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor, and the attack was in response to a video, and we discussed our grandchildren on the tarmac meeting.

I'm not sure where I said Trump was the only person which has not told the truth in their life, only he was more prolific and transparent a liar than anyone I've ever seen.
 
I'm not sure where I said Trump was the only person which has not told the truth in their life, only he was more prolific and transparent a liar than anyone I've ever seen.
I am more concerned with what people do than what they say. Words are cheap.
 
Then give me an example of a lie Trump has told.

He has over 8000 which are documented. Just recently, he lied about losing for clearance for his daughter. He's lied about the nature of the caravan. He lied about millions of illegals voting. He lies about stuff he's clearly said on camera. I mean, you have to really be detached from reality to not know his proclivity for lying. It's been his calling card for decades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
He has over 8000 which are documented. Just recently, he lied about losing for clearance for his daughter. He's lied about the nature of the caravan. He lied about millions of illegals voting. He lies about stuff he's clearly said on camera. I mean, you have to really be detached from reality to not know his proclivity for lying. It's been his calling card for decades.

You mean the caravans that the DHS secretary commented on today amid the recent border crisis? Are you saying illegals don’t vote?
 
You mean the caravans that the DHS secretary commented on today amid the recent border crisis? Are you saying illegals don’t vote?

Let's let the results of Trump's own investigation into illegals voting be the final say. Well, before it was disbanded without finding anything.

Otherwise, let's note Trump's political forays began with the huge Birther lie. Seems fitting how he got his start.
 
You need a hobby. It's not healthy to obsess over a politician. Seek professional help.

Dear God, another absurd right turn in the discussion. Can't you give a straight argument without all these silly responses? Spending a little time discussing politics doesn't make one obsessed any more than you are obsessed with me by continuously responding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
Dear God, another absurd right turn in the discussion. Can't you give a straight argument without all these silly responses? Spending a little time discussing politics doesn't make one obsessed any more than you are obsessed with me by continuously responding.
1-800-suicide prevention. Call now. They should be open 24-7. We are all pulling for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
Let's let the results of Trump's own investigation into illegals voting be the final say. Well, before it was disbanded without finding anything.

Otherwise, let's note Trump's political forays began with the huge Birther lie. Seems fitting how he got his start.

RIP Loretta Fuddy
 
If he’s a veteran Trump just did a little more to look out for him.
Trump is also aware of the fragile mental state that many are in since he and Putin stole the election from Hillary. Like I said, help is just a phone call away for these poor souls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C-south
Are a lot of Democratic voters regular Fox viewers?

This thread gets at the underlying issue here: Would the network moderators ask questions about stuff primary voters care about?


No, but you're assuming everyone that watches will be a loyal Republican. That's the same as assuming everyone who watches CNN is a loyal Democrat. Somewhere in there are independents, and if you want to win, that's who you'll need to sway. Seems like another misstep IMO. Like Hillary thinking she could skip campaigning in certain states.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
1-800-suicide prevention. Call now. They should be open 24-7. We are all pulling for you.

Here's the conundrum. Do I respond with something snippy and play this silly game? Or, do I respond with some thoughtful answer, as I have been doing, and continue to entertain your inability to come up with anything resembling an intelligent thought because, at this point, the only time I've thought about suicide is when I realized how many people like you are in the world. The thought is terrifying.

I guess that was snippy. Oh well.
 
Any of them making policy with the administration? No, and this is a mischaracterization of their role, not to mention wikileaks was solely dedicated to embarrassing and defeating Hillary. Besides, being "helpful" could just mean they are like minded or push the same ideas as the candidates. It doesn't mean they are working in concert with the administration or campaign.

To provide a better example, Donna Brazile wss discovered to have given a question to Clinton. She was then fired by CNN.

I know the go to always by conservatives and Trump supporters is always to go "Well, what about ....!?" in all situations to normalize the absurdity of the Trump Era as much as possible, but there isn't anything like this which has happened previously.
You did a comparison, which is an automatic " what about" i just found your comparison lacking in a different perspective and facts.
Wikileaks was founded in 2006, it publishes information from all different sources. It's a whistle blowers haven. If Julian Assange built it to solely embarrass Hillary hes got amazing foresight 10 years ahead of her run.
Donna and Hillary got caught with their hands in the cookie jar. Donna happened to be the only wrist available to slap. No one dared slap Hillary's wrist ( you know she offs people...lol)

If you look at those sources many of them work for msm and had associations in Obama's administration and even his cabinet. Id call that helpful.. Wouldn't you. Susan rice- husband ian Cameron, executive producer for ABC29402536-7628-47FC-B724-1074DE819B2E.jpeg
( list from 2013)
I'll let you draw your own conclusions, mine was " gees, msm was Obama's b*!ch" and some of them literally in bed together. Except when fox and AP got frisky and the nsa hacked their computers for sources. Silly reporters trying to be journalists...pffft, Because they went negative on Obama.

Do i believe that trump kabitzes with fox, absolutely. Do i believe it's any different than Obama did...no, with one caveat, Obama had many outlets to trumps one. Saying that this is new because..... Trump, not buying it.
 
I see the Trumpkins are still convincing themselves that a guy who thinks highly of Alex Jones is “just another politician.”
 
You did a comparison, which is an automatic " what about" i just found your comparison lacking in a different perspective and facts.
Wikileaks was founded in 2006, it publishes information from all different sources. It's a whistle blowers haven. If Julian Assange built it to solely embarrass Hillary hes got amazing foresight 10 years ahead of her run.
Donna and Hillary got caught with their hands in the cookie jar. Donna happened to be the only wrist available to slap. No one dared slap Hillary's wrist ( you know she offs people...lol)

If you look at those sources many of them work for msm and had associations in Obama's administration and even his cabinet. Id call that helpful.. Wouldn't you. Susan rice- husband ian Cameron, executive producer for ABCView attachment 196776
( list from 2013)
I'll let you draw your own conclusions, mine was " gees, msm was Obama's b*!ch" and some of them literally in bed together. Except when fox and AP got frisky and the nsa hacked their computers for sources. Silly reporters trying to be journalists...pffft, Because they went negative on Obama.

Do i believe that trump kabitzes with fox, absolutely. Do i believe it's any different than Obama did...no, with one caveat, Obama had many outlets to trumps one. Saying that this is new because..... Trump, not buying it.

How about noting the number of former Bush and Trump officials hired by CNN, too? There are plenty of them. News agencies hiring former officials to comment on politics is nothing new, at all. You still miss the uniqueness of a news agency having this kind of direct influence with a current administration. If you find any evidence of CNN or the Post or anyone who was meeting or talking with Obama every day to mold policy, then commenting on it on air, or jumping on the stage at a political rally as a member of the media, let me know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
Advertisement

Back
Top