Dems won't let Fox News host primary debate

Fox had solid reporting on the Stormy Daniels affair and killed the story to help Trump. Until they internally investigate, confirm or deny and if true fire everyone involved in that decision and beg forgiveness, the Dems should treat Fox for what it is -- a wholly owned propaganda arm of Trump.

Not only should the Dem candidates boycott Fox; frankly, so should the Republicans. Why on Earth would a GOP candidate want to be tethered to Trump and the cozy relationship with Fox? It can only hurt the candidate with moderate or thinking Republicans.
Same reason a moderate avoids CNN &MSNBC the slant left is too great. The "wholly owned propaganda arm" of the left.
 
Fox had solid reporting on the Stormy Daniels affair and killed the story to help Trump. Until they internally investigate, confirm or deny and if true fire everyone involved in that decision and beg forgiveness, the Dems should treat Fox for what it is -- a wholly owned propaganda arm of Trump.

Not only should the Dem candidates boycott Fox; frankly, so should the Republicans. Why on Earth would a GOP candidate want to be tethered to Trump and the cozy relationship with Fox? It can only hurt the candidate with moderate or thinking Republicans.

Sounds like you've been drinking too many margaritas on the beach tonight.
 
No, it is not like CNN and MSNBC. Those two may be ideologically aligned with Democrats, but they didn't have people working for the news agency meeting daily with the president (Obama) and reporting on the policy they were directly involved with making.

There's a clear distinction and line many of you are missing here. There's a difference between a news agency representing a certain political perspective and being the actual, literal mouthpiece for an administration. It didn't happen with CNN and Obama and it didn't happen with Bush and Fox, either.
I don't think I'm missing anything...CB628D45-2317-425F-A621-ECF25EE90E87.jpeg3DD8833A-E1CD-45A7-9FD7-CD2D7F457F24.jpegE7515A8F-D760-4331-A875-C31DB82480AB.jpegA487B895-21D7-424B-9933-C2B16E6C1331.jpeg
These "reporters" names were sent to Hillary's camp in an email starting they had been helpful in releasing our " positions" in the past... Meaning the last administration. They also were heavily counted upon during the campaign to support Hillary as i believe Jake Tapper repeated on air " we couldn't have helped her anymore".
 
I don't think I'm missing anything...View attachment 196754View attachment 196755View attachment 196756View attachment 196757
These "reporters" names were sent to Hillary's camp in an email starting they had been helpful in releasing our " positions" in the past... Meaning the last administration. They also were heavily counted upon during the campaign to support Hillary as i believe Jake Tapper repeated on air " we couldn't have helped her anymore".
But, but, but Fox News and Trump...………………...
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol
Wouldn’t shock me one bit to see Trump not do any debates in the General and just hold pep rallies.


Oh, please. He will go just so he can lob insults and names at the Dem candidate and the media. It's his entire, tired, schtick.
 
I don't think I'm missing anything...View attachment 196754View attachment 196755View attachment 196756View attachment 196757
These "reporters" names were sent to Hillary's camp in an email starting they had been helpful in releasing our " positions" in the past... Meaning the last administration. They also were heavily counted upon during the campaign to support Hillary as i believe Jake Tapper repeated on air " we couldn't have helped her anymore".

Any of them making policy with the administration? No, and this is a mischaracterization of their role, not to mention wikileaks was solely dedicated to embarrassing and defeating Hillary. Besides, being "helpful" could just mean they are like minded or push the same ideas as the candidates. It doesn't mean they are working in concert with the administration or campaign.

To provide a better example, Donna Brazile wss discovered to have given a question to Clinton. She was then fired by CNN.

I know the go to always by conservatives and Trump supporters is always to go "Well, what about ....!?" in all situations to normalize the absurdity of the Trump Era as much as possible, but there isn't anything like this which has happened previously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
Being honest doesn’t have to be nice.

When had he been honest? He's the most transparent and prolific liar I've ever seen in public life. He's made me realize how Nigerian prince scammers could thrive in this country.
 
When had he been honest? He's the most transparent and prolific liar I've ever seen in public life. He's made me realize how Nigerian prince scammers could thrive in this country.

What has he lied about? Did you fact check whether he had 2 or 3 Big Macs last week when he said 2?
 
When had he been honest? He's the most transparent and prolific liar I've ever seen in public life. He's made me realize how Nigerian prince scammers could thrive in this country.
He's doing a good job though, considering he's out there by himself. Sit back and enjoy the ride.
 
Oh, please. He will go just so he can lob insults and names at the Dem candidate and the media. It's his entire, tired, schtick.
You think he would prefer an honest debate about his record over a pep rally? The key to any presidential election is moving 5% of the middle.

The key with trump is don’t get in the mud with him. He calls you a name ignore it. He lies. State the facts. Don’t let him trap you in his game.
 
He's doing a good job though, considering he's out there by himself. Sit back and enjoy the ride.

His incompetence gives me relief, since he's as bad, or worse than, Bush, but without the intelligence, knowledge of law or sensibility to have his policies become effective. This is different than W., who didn't have to be told (and then ignore) the things he wanted were illegal.
 
His incompetence gives me relief, since he's as bad, or worse than, Bush, but without the intelligence, knowledge of law or sensibility to have his policies become effective. This is different than W., who didn't have to be told (and then ignore) the things he wanted were illegal.
….and I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky, not a single time, never.
 

VN Store



Back
Top