luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 48,644
- Likes
- 21,046
That's a pretty good analogy. I consider myself more as a window providing a view of reality you'd prefer not to see.
Everyone's reality is different. You often suffer from thinking yours is the only one, or at least the only one that matters. Tunnel vision is not an admirable trait. Not everyone has the same view outside their window.
Which is why I give the view from my window, so people can view reality from different perspectives.
Incomprehensible to you, i do see that balance coming back. Like ive said before, i couldn't quite bring myself to vote for him but he strikes the cord with Americans to preserve sovereignty. I think you underestimate middle America and the quiet supporters. The ones who have been sitting and watching and paying attention to where we were headed and said no to that direction. Unless a better candidate shows up, it's trump for the next 6.As hard as I try, I can't see that. I'll trust that you see something that allows you to conclude Trump is something other than the joke seen by most.
Whether you can see it or not, most people in this nation and abroad view trump as a despicable human and horrible president who plays to the worst instincts of a certain segment of society.
The concept that Trump was some type of necessary correction is incomprehensible.
Maybe you guys just picked the absolutely worst possible person to be the face of that correction.
Incomprehensible to you, i do see that balance coming back. Like ive said before, i couldn't quite bring myself to vote for him but he strikes the cord with Americans to preserve sovereignty. I think you underestimate middle America and the quiet supporters. The ones who have been sitting and watching and paying attention to where we were headed and said no to that direction. Unless a better candidate shows up, it's trump for the next 6.
Society is the moral standard.....okeydokey. I Must beg to differ.Luther obviously lives in an echo chamber. Further, he's posted here on more than one occasion that he filters possible reality based on his emotional response to a fact. In other words, he's literally said that he rejects possibilities based on how their reality would make him feel.
Take his beliefs with less than a grain of salt, as they are emotionally based and invariably riddled with internal contradictions--like the fact that society is the moral standard, yet society is also on a trajectory of moral improvement.
I didn't say anything about the road to globalism, which is where we were headed, limiting freedom. I said total globalism is the death of sovereignty. Total Globalism is the destruction of the US, attacks on the constitution will follow, ( 2A attacks currently happening) this follows loss of personal rights and freedoms. We get to that point, it's waaay too late.Name one freedom in your life that has been lost due to "globalism."
I didn't say anything about the road to globalism, which is where we were headed, limiting freedom. I said total globalism is the death of sovereignty. Total Globalism is the destruction of the US, attacks on the constitution will follow, ( 2A attacks currently happening) this follows loss of personal rights and freedoms. We get to that point, it's waaay too late.
I didn't think this was a second amendment argument, i just used it as an example. I don't care where you stand on 2A. I'm talking bigger picture.Second amendment attacks are directly related to people not liking getting shot. And I'm not anti second amendment, but don't make up conspiracies to explain something that's very simple.
You have to admit, the projected changes do not favor the math for the GOP.
