cncchris33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2009
- Messages
- 32,465
- Likes
- 45,462
I think we can all agree that Barnes is a different coach today than he was 10 years ago. He has basically changed everything about his approach. He is just now getting an opportunity to reap the rewards of it. Last year was a disappointing finish, and I'm convinced losing KA made a difference. Still, they should have advanced past Loyola-Chicago.Maybe if Barnes makes a S16 for the first time in a decade this year he can change my mind. I’ll take the guy with 4 FF’s, four 30 win seasons, 11 different SEC titles, and a national championship this decade
I still believe Barnes is a better Xs and Os coach than Cal, and an equally effective recruiter (which is different that saying a better recruiter). I think both coaches do a great job of grabbing kids who fit their vastly different systems and molding them into a team. Cal's model, while infinitely more talented and able to immediately contribute, is also a much more volatile approach. He's won a national title and lost in the 1st round of the NIT with the exact same approach.
It's a little early to judge whether Barnes will be able to sustain more stable success with his new approach.