Amateur Hour Continues

Great to see our very serious president is hard at work trying to resolve our national emergency tonight.
 
Among other things, why is he citing Buchanan?

A militarized border? Like Rocket Man has?
Buchanan is the one actually running the country. Well, Buchanan, Rush, Hannity, and Ann Coulter. Trump is just a figurehead.
P.S. Buchanan wrote an article telling Trump to declare a state of emergency a couple of days ago.
 
Among other things, why is he citing Buchanan?

A militarized border? Like Rocket Man has?

I read the "do not go gentle into that good night" line and said no ******* way does he even know who Dylan Thomas is and then I saw he was quoting Buchanan.

The howler in the argument to me is that he's assuming all ICE deportations are of people who crossed the southern border illegally. But ICE deports lots of folks, not just those who crossed the US-Mexico border illegally.
 
Looks like it was originally posted here, though. He didn't write it for that site.

Memo to Trump: Declare an Emergency, by Patrick Buchanan

Pretty shocking passage from the Buchanan article:

"Trump should declare a national emergency, shift funds out of the Pentagon, build his wall, open the government and charge Democrats with finding excuses not to secure our border because they have a demographic and ideological interest in changing the face of the nation.

For the larger the share of the U.S. population that requires welfare, the greater the need for more social workers, and the more voters there will be to vote to further grow the liberal welfare state.

The more multiracial, multiethnic, multicultural, multilingual America becomes — the less it looks like Ronald Reagan's America — the more dependably Democratic it will become.

The Democratic Party is hostile to white men, because the smaller the share of the U.S. population that white men become, the sooner that Democrats inherit the national estate.

The only way to greater "diversity," the golden calf of the Democratic Party, is to increase the number of women, African-Americans, Asians and Hispanics, and thereby reduce the number of white men."
 
Pretty shocking passage from the Buchanan article:

"Trump should declare a national emergency, shift funds out of the Pentagon, build his wall, open the government and charge Democrats with finding excuses not to secure our border because they have a demographic and ideological interest in changing the face of the nation.

For the larger the share of the U.S. population that requires welfare, the greater the need for more social workers, and the more voters there will be to vote to further grow the liberal welfare state.

The more multiracial, multiethnic, multicultural, multilingual America becomes — the less it looks like Ronald Reagan's America — the more dependably Democratic it will become.

The Democratic Party is hostile to white men, because the smaller the share of the U.S. population that white men become, the sooner that Democrats inherit the national estate.

The only way to greater "diversity," the golden calf of the Democratic Party, is to increase the number of women, African-Americans, Asians and Hispanics, and thereby reduce the number of white men."
I don't find it shocking at all.
 
I don't find it shocking at all.

I don't find it shocking that you don't find it shocking.

Interesting that this makes it clear that for Republicans this is really about changing demographics (the browning of America) and not illegal immigrant crime or bringing "law and order" to the immigration system.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top