Recruiting Forum Football Talk [RIP 9.3.2019]

Status
Not open for further replies.
#93,205
#93,205
Anyone see Gus pulling out all the stops to save his job? Offered Derricks Browns brother who is unrated and had not major offers which is telling considering his brother is a star so you know people have look into him. Few days later Derrick says he is coming back. You know that had to be part of the deal to get him back. Dumb for him because he would be a top pick but I understand he wants his brother to get a shot
 
  • Like
Reactions: nicksjuzunk
#93,207
#93,207
dimondvol said:
Chaney head-co-OC. Tee and Friend co-assistant-OCs?
Click to expand...

If it was me as HC my offensive staff with Tee/Chaney hires would be as below.

OC/QB - Chaney
RB/co-OC/PGC - Tee
OL/RGC - Friend (not sure he cares about a co-OC title)
WR - DJ
TE - Nieds

That'd be a very good group of recruiters too, and the reason why I let Tee coach RBs is simple, it gives him another notch and helps further groom him to be a better OC.
 
#93,208
#93,208
MoCo_Vol said:
If it was me as HC my offensive staff with Tee/Chaney hires would be as below.

OC/QB - Chaney
RB/co-OC/PGC - Tee
OL/RGC - Friend (not sure he cares about a co-OC title)
WR - DJ
TE - Nieds

That'd be a very good group of recruiters too, and the reason why I let Tee coach RBs is simple, it gives him another notch and helps further groom him to be a better OC.
Click to expand...
Remove the Co-OC /PGC and Im down with that.
 
#93,213
#93,213
Agree with @LA Vol, would love to have Sark here for long term, but It sounds like he will bolt at the first decent nfl opportunity he has. Chaney you could atleast keep around. He’s good, just not a sexy, splash hire like most want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SweetasSoda
#93,214
#93,214
MoCo_Vol said:
If it was me as HC my offensive staff with Tee/Chaney hires would be as below.

OC/QB - Chaney
RB/co-OC/PGC - Tee
OL/RGC - Friend (not sure he cares about a co-OC title)
WR - DJ
TE - Nieds

That'd be a very good group of recruiters too, and the reason why I let Tee coach RBs is simple, it gives him another notch and helps further groom him to be a better OC.
Click to expand...

I don't understand how it's mentioned Chaney was unhappy about being Co-OC at UGA, but he's going to come here and be a Co-OC?
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfan4lyfe and SweetasSoda
#93,216
#93,216
Z06VolinWV said:
Agree with @LA Vol, would love to have Sark here for long term, but It sounds like he will bolt at the first decent nfl opportunity he has. Chaney you could atleast keep around. He’s good, just not a sexy, splash hire like most want.
Click to expand...

I think Chaney is most definitely a splash hire
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nash_Vol97, drylo, SweetasSoda and 1 other person
#93,219
#93,219
I am fine with all the names being thrown around, seems like someone will be named soon. I want Tee here, but he definitely needs help. He didn't get fired at USC for no reason.
 
#93,220
#93,220
Z06VolinWV said:
Agree with @LA Vol, would love to have Sark here for long term, but It sounds like he will bolt at the first decent nfl opportunity he has. Chaney you could atleast keep around. He’s good, just not a sexy, splash hire like most want.
Click to expand...
Two years of Sark, then theoretically hand it over to Tee.

That’ll work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Z06VolinWV and Bassmaster_Vol
#93,221
#93,221
LA Vol said:
What UT needs and what Fulmer wants is stability. The more new guys brought in, the higher the risk of conflict. And the last thing UT needs is more coaching searches next year. So anybody brought in will be expected to stick.
Click to expand...
Thats whats intriguing about the difference between Chaney and Sark. I firmly believe the only reason Chaney was not here longer the first time was UT got to their 3rd HC during his time here. Sark is more likely to be gone after a couple years than Chaney if Pruitt makes it 5+ years.

Tee is the interesting one in regards to stability. Im sure Pruitt and Fulmer would both like to have him on staff from a recruiting standpoint alone and i think he's a good position coach. But how long before he tests the OC waters again.
 
#93,222
#93,222
Z06VolinWV said:
Agree with @LA Vol, would love to have Sark here for long term, but It sounds like he will bolt at the first decent nfl opportunity he has. Chaney you could atleast keep around. He’s good, just not a sexy, splash hire like most want.
Click to expand...

IF Sark comes to TN as OC then it's because he doesn't have NFL options he supposedly seeks. So in all likelihood if he comes back to college his next step would be college HC. That would take at least 2 years at TN imo for it to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nesbuddha66
#93,224
#93,224
BeecherVol said:
Remove the Co-OC /PGC and Im down with that.
Click to expand...

I could also see Friend or Nieds doing RBs and letting Tee have QBs...if that's a hangup. I'd be fine with just adding Chaney and keeping the rest of the staff as is, felt like our biggest offensive woes were lesser OL play (which to me is more about attrition and not having the talent as deep) and Helton's shortcomings as a play caller. Felt like the WRs and RBs did fine, with better blocking they would have had even better numbers. TEs probably didn't produce as much as we'd like, but also were limited because they had to block more to try and help the OL.

I think Tee or Chaney coaching QBs is an upgrade over Helton as well.
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top