To Protect and to Serve II

Home-Schooling Parent In Worcester Was Arrested In Her Home. Now She's Suing

The lawsuit alleges that police knocked on Josilyn Goodall's door on March 30, saying her son had missed so much school that they were there to confirm the 8-year-old boy — called "A.S." in the suit — was "living and breathing."

But the situation escalated quickly, the complaint says, with police threatening to force open the door after Goodall refused to admit them. When she relented, the lawsuit says an officer "handcuffed Josilyn ... [ordered] her in a loud, raised voice to sit down ... and took her to the police station" with no charges filed.
 
Suspended San Francisco police officer accused of robbing bank

A suspended San Francisco police officer was charged Wednesday with allegedly robbing a bank of more than $9,000 in cash.
Daugherty was already on suspension from the San Francisco Police Department without pay due to an unrelated criminal investigation in San Mateo County, according to the filing.

Daugherty was also one of nine current and former San Francisco officers accused in administrative disciplinary charges in 2015 for allegedly sending racist, anti-Semitic, homophobic and sexist text messages sent in 2011 and 2012, NBC Bay Area reports.

The messages came to light during the federal prosecution of former Sgt. Ian Furminger, who was convicted in 2014 on charges of conspiracy to commit theft, conspiracy to violate civil rights and wire fraud in a case involving stealing money and property from drug suspects. Furminger was sentenced to 41 months in prison a year later.
 
The messages came to light during the federal prosecution of former Sgt. Ian Furminger, who was convicted in 2014 on charges of conspiracy to commit theft, conspiracy to violate civil rights and wire fraud in a case involving stealing money and property from drug suspects. Furminger was sentenced to 41 months in prison a year later.
How is this any different than civil asset forfeiture?
 

From the article....
At least two doctors resisted the police request. An X-ray already had indicated no drugs. They saw no medical need to perform an invasive procedure on someone against his will.

The notes from police and doctors suggest some tension, a standoff. At one point, eight police officers were at the hospital. A doctor remembers telling officers: "We would not be doing that."

Once again... That's so strange that, considering 99% of LEOs are so virtuous, that you managed to have 8 scumbags in one place at the same time. What are the odds?
 
From the article....


Once again... That's so strange that, considering 99% of LEOs are so virtuous, that you managed to have 8 scumbags in one place at the same time. What are the odds?
A group of officers and a judge forcing an anal rape and gathering to watch. There is no way there wasn't some sort of masochism involved here.
 
From the article....


Once again... That's so strange that, considering 99% of LEOs are so virtuous, that you managed to have 8 scumbags in one place at the same time. What are the odds?
Why were they so eager to get inside his rectum? Like the article says, the X-ray exam (probably done illegally) had confirmed that there was nothing there.
 
Thats terrible, should never happen, ever.

Bright side? Couple years they will settle out of court for high six figures on the lawsuit. If the guy is smart, he just got retired from ever having to do a hard days work again.
 
Thats terrible, should never happen, ever.

Bright side? Couple years they will settle out of court for high six figures on the lawsuit. If the guy is smart, he just got retired from ever having to do a hard days work again.
I hardly see a bright side in the taxpayers being forced to pay for the thuggery of the local police department. The cops involved should have to pay personally. Perhaps even losing their precious pensions.
 
Thats terrible, should never happen, ever.

Bright side? Couple years they will settle out of court for high six figures on the lawsuit. If the guy is smart, he just got retired from ever having to do a hard days work again.
So would you trade your manhood and dignity for a payday? I only ask this facetious question because you inquired if this was a bright side.
 
I hardly see a bright side in the taxpayers being forced to pay for the thuggery of the local police department. The cops involved should have to pay personally. Perhaps even losing their precious pensions.

They should all (including the judge) be charged with sexual assault, due time, and be placed on the sex offenders list.

I mean seriously... Would some like to explain to me how this isn’t clearly sexual assault?
 
Advertisement

Back
Top