Trump vs Pelosi and Schumer

You weren't reading between the lines. I've already stated that a reliable E-verify system and jailing the employers who hire illegals would have them going back to Mexico so fast that Mexico may want to build the wall after all. Cut the head off the snake, disincentivize, it starts with a reliable e-verify program.

How do you propose to stop the flow of illegal drugs through the southern border?
 
Is it not possible to do both?

That is, to be anti PC but also not a jackass conman and a fraudster? To me, being anti PC is simply not worth the price of Trump's mal and misfeasance in office.

Certainly it's possible, but nobody else makes it work. In the PC world anyone who opposes the PC culture in a sane and contentious manner is burned at the stake figuratively - and literally if given the opportunity. It's impossible to be polite (judged to be weak) with the PC crowd without being shredded ... they are of the my way or the highway philosophy ... always correct (never right) ... scorched earth in a debate assuming you can get a word in. Only completely intemperate clowns like Trump stand a chance. It falls into the never argue with a fool category because they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. Trump is at their intellectual level - just of a different philosophy, so he's got the experience necessary to hold his own with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
You mean to tell me they can go under the wall? Now what?
This isn't the 1960s. Sensors go in with the wall.

Here's some more breaking news for you mick, they can go over the wall too. But it's hard to carry a 40 ft extension ladder a 1000 miles along with your 6 and 9 year olds in diapers.
 
This isn't the 1960s. Sensors go in with the wall.

Here's some more breaking news for you mick, they can go over the wall too. But it's hard to carry a 40 ft extension ladder a 1000 miles along with your 6 and 9 year olds in diapers.

The naiveté on display here is astonishing. Why would you think anyone would need to carry a ladder 1,000 miles?

There are 22 home depots in Mexico

map-mexico-sq.jpg
 
The naiveté on display here is astonishing. Why would you think anyone would need to carry a ladder 1,000 miles?

There are 22 home depots in Mexico

map-mexico-sq.jpg
I see the joke went over your head. From what I've read the wall and ground would have sensors. The wall sensors will pick up the vibration of a ladder when poncho starts up it.

Your defense of a wall not stopping them is boring. As it is, hundreds can run in all directions crossing. With a wall there it slows them coming in to a snails pace.
 
I'd wager that migrants are often used as drug mules.
I'd think a small fraction at best. Why would they trust migrants to run their million dollar product? Get them across the border in the US and run the risk of them reporting that tunnel.

If a wall is built and it forces migrants to use tunnels, especially cartel tunnels, that's a win for the US.
 
I'd think a small fraction at best. Why would they trust migrants to run their million dollar product? Get them across the border in the US and run the risk of them reporting that tunnel.

It's easier to picture them running into nothingness with 50 pounds of pot on their back or carrying two small children while pregnant.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top