Kingston Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2009
- Messages
- 26,319
- Likes
- 28,814
But wouldn't that have a longer term impact on the "trust" factor? One thing I have thought of could it be a FCS (previously posted D2 but should have had FCS) head coach whose team is in the playoffs and has asked not to be announced until their season ends.Now, this could be a logical explanation. Only thing I could think of is if Nieds got an opportunity elsewhere, and Pruitt doesn’t want to announce he’s leaving until after ESD. If he left, he could affect many of our big recruits.
Unless, by not having that 10th spot filled yet, he is getting the benefit of one of the best recruiters/closers out on the road for him. It just so happens to be his boss and a HOF, national champion former coach and current AD. Not many hires out there going to ring the bell in recruiting like Phil. Just a hunch...
But there’s been no word that Fulmer has been our recruiting. Felton has been the 10th guy out on the road.
Just to add to this, I think as fans we want to see UT making big, splash moves, so that we can prove to ourselves and others that we're out there doing whatever is necessary to win. I think that's why you see the obsession with Gruden and Freeze. It's not that those guys are leaps and bounds better than other candidates; it's that they are household names with proven records. We'd rather have rival teams and their fans instantly thinking "oh ****" instead of them laughing after doing a google search, only to find that the guy we hired is excellent after his first season or two.It’s the same thing that stirs the Gruden stuff every 4 years. I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about this.
I think part of it is that we have a huge fan base hungry for any good news. So that hunger makes them gullible.
I also think we have a ton of boosters/administrators/insiders who love attention and like to stir the pot. So they all compete against each other to see who can promote the craziest rumor.
Also, people want to believe their “leaders” (I use that loosely) are competent. So when no news gets out, people want to believe it’s because everything is being handled behind the scenes. “There has to be a plan! Otherwise none of this makes sense!”
Just to add to this, I think as fans we want to see UT making big, splash moves, so that we can prove to ourselves and others that we're out there doing whatever is necessary to win. I think that's why you see the obsession with Gruden and Freeze. It's not that those guys are leaps and bounds better than other candidates; it's that they are household names with proven records. We'd rather have rival teams and their fans instantly thinking "oh ****" instead of them laughing after doing a google search, only to find that the guy we hired is excellent after his first season or two.
Only reason I have hope for what Matthews is saying is because it was obvious Helton was out the door with weeks left of the season. At least leaks of him & Pruitt not meshing well surfaced.
I refuse to believe Pruitt didn't have some sort of plan in mind well before the end of the season to replace him. As it looks now, he is either completely unorganized and lost or he has had a consistent plan he has stuck to and didn't care what story line the fans/media built on their own.
For every story you hear about the guy, most say he is intelligent and calculated. I don't see why it would be any different here.
I'm frustrated with the timeline like everyone else. But I'm holding out hope he & Fulmer are in their zone and leading the program in the right direction.
Don't be bringing common sense up in here!One last thing: big names generally come with big egos, and power struggles, a clash of wills and a divided staff will slow the rebuild. The quickest way to winning is for Pruitt to hire a guy who can be what he needs him to be-- not who the fans want him to be.
Carry on.
USC
2006 (Lane Kiffin OC) - 30.5 PPG
2007 (Sarkisian OC) - 32.6 PPG
2008 (Sarkisian OC) - 37.5 PPG
2009 (After Sark) - 26.5 PPG
Washington
2008 (Ty Willingham HC) - 13.2 PPG
2009 (Sarkisian HC) - 26.1 PPG
2010 (Sarkisian HC) - 21.8 PPG
2011 (Sarkisian HC) - 33.4 PPG
2012 (Sarkisian HC) - 24.0 PPG
2013 (Sarkisian HC) - 37.9 PPG
USC (again)
2013 (Kiffin HC) - 29.7 PPG
2014 (Sarkisian HC) - 35.8 PPG
2015 (5 games Sarkisian / 9 games Helton) - 39.8 PPG / 30.67 PPG
He's done better with the talent he had at USC than pretty much anyone since or during the Carroll era, and really elevated the Washington offense while he was there.
I don't care what level they coach at as long as they can recruit and develop talent at the level we need them to in order to be successful. The X's and O's are the same. If you know the game, you know the game. They are just getting to work with more elite athletes.We would consider that a McGoogle or trot hire.