Recruiting Forum Football Talk [RIP 9.3.2019]

Status
Not open for further replies.
He's saying the future OC is not yet available available to start working before ESD, so announcing him now would require us to pull a current recruiter off the road without being able to plug the new OC in the same position.
And that’s incorrect. You can designate anyone you want to be an on the road recruiter. Hiring an OC has no bearing on that.

If we wanted to, right now, we could pull Jeremy Pruitt off the recruiting roll and put Tino Sunseri on there. It wouldn’t mean we’d have to fire Jeremy Pruitt.
 
He’s FOS. With the way he is saying this, he might as well say “I don’t know who or when, but I do know that UT will have an OC next season.”

He’s just covering his a** because he is in the dark as well.

It’s funny how you guys don’t have a clue what’s going on, are melting down over it, hanging on every word anybody reports, then trash info like you have a clue.
 
Wasnt it a package deal with Mustain that brought Malzhan to Arky straight from HS?

I think he brought 3 big time players with him when he took the Arkansas OC position. It all fell apart when Nutt didn't let him run his offense after he was hired.
 
So who’s feeding info to Hubbs/Price/Brice and who’s feeding info to Matthews? Because they are all clearly on 2 ends of the spectrum. Has anyone asked Hubbs about what Matthews is saying? @RonSwanson
Agree. One note, DM has been consistent on his statements whereas Hubbs and Brice have changed directions throughout the past two weeks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nesbuddha66
And that’s incorrect. You can designate anyone you want to be an on the road recruiter. Hiring an OC has no bearing on that.

If we wanted to, right now, we could pull Jeremy Pruitt off the recruiting roll and put Tino Sunseri on there. It wouldn’t mean we’d have to fire Jeremy Pruitt.
You may very well be right, but I'm just relaying how I read his statement. I don't know enough about the rules to know.
 
And that’s incorrect. You can designate anyone you want to be an on the road recruiter. Hiring an OC has no bearing on that.

Maybe it’s the other way around and the OC feels he needs to finish his season with his current team and doesn’t want his hiring being a distraction before the season/playoffs etc are done.
 
from a Houston Chronicle article

As part of the new deal, Briles would not owe a buyout if he resigns and accepts a college head coaching job following UH's last 2019 regular season game or the 2019 American Athletic Conference championship game if UH is a participant. If Briles leaves prior to those dates, the buyout would be at the discretion of the school's vice president of intercollegiate athletics but not more than 50 percent of the remaining base salary.

Briles would owe 25 percent of his remaining base salary if he resigns to accept a position as a play-calling offensive coordinator after the final regular season game or league title game. A similar move to a Power Five conference school prior to those dates would be at the discretion of UH, but not to exceed 50 percent of the remaining base salary.
 
You may very well be right, but I'm just relaying how I read his statement. I don't know enough about the rules to know.
And I understand that’s what Doug Matthews is insinuating. Which is why I know he’s just bullsh*tting and trying to come up with anything to justify his 95% comment.
 
@LA Vol
My question to you is do you think Pruitt is adapting his previous offensive philosophy stance given the candidates he is looking at?
From another post you made it sound like Pruitt had an air it out guy in Helton already. What would be the difference with a guy like Yurcich or others? Just personality fit?

Pruitt’s looking to change it up. Helton wanted to open up the offense and passing game, so their philosophical disconnect could have been bridged. Both seemed to want to move on, though, and sometimes, that’s best. Everybody gets a clean slate.

I think Pruitt has been talking to a lot of offensive guys, getting different takes on how the offense can evolve as seamlessly as possible. Saban and Fulmer like to pick people’s brains, so Pruitt probably sees value in doing that. Scheme is important, but IMO, trust is the driver. UT is going to have to hire the guy that Pruitt thinks is the right fit for what he wants to do and the staff he already has in place. It's the quickest path to winning.
 
So who’s feeding info to Hubbs/Price/Brice and who’s feeding info to Matthews? Because they are all clearly in 2 ends of the spectrum. Has anyone asked Hubbs about what Matthews is saying? @RonSwanson
I doubt Matthew's is running with anything not coming from or backed up by Phil. The other 3 are well connected in varying ways across campus.

Its obvious that information is very limited and has become speculation in some cases. They re all getting questions they don't have much to answer with.

Pruitt doesn't come across as the type trying to appease those worried about the timing. Im good with that. He could have made a good or bad hire in 2 days and had it announced. He can also make a good or bad hire in a month. Until they announce a hire and works here you're not gonna know which.
 
I have a sneaky suspicion that Tulsa would beat Tennessee right now and we're gonna get our shot with UAB next year. We are nowhere near a powerhouse anymore. Only in our minds.
SO we should just tear Neyland down and get us about a 50K capacity stadium on the level with UAB and Tulsa. Hiring unqualified coaches is exactly why we are in the situation we are now. If we're striving to be a Tulsa or a UAB we need to adjust our ticket prices and act like a Tulsa or UAB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UTSuave’
Pruitt’s looking to change it up. Helton wanted to open up the offense and passing game, so their philosophical disconnect could have been bridged. Both seemed to want to move on, though, and sometimes, that’s best. Everybody gets a clean slate.

I think Pruitt has been talking to a lot of offensive guys, getting different takes on how the offense can evolve as seamlessly as possible. Saban and Fulmer like to pick people’s brains, so Pruitt probably sees value in doing that. Scheme is important, but IMO, trust is the driver. UT is going to have to hire the guy that Pruitt thinks is the right fit for what he wants to do and the staff he already has in place. It's the quickest path to winning.
Thanks so much for responding, really appreciate the insight.
 
So are we equating Tulsa to Tennessee? Tulsa, UAB, Alcorn State, West Texas tech, this are schools you go earn your stripes, not Tennessee.
How about Clemson one short year later. He’s the architect of what we see annually in the playoffs...do anything for you?
 
IMO, it's down to Yurcich, Chaney, or Chip Long with Propst being an extreme long shot. Propst couldn't be announced before because you can't be hired as a NCAA coach and still finish out a HS season. Chaney's contract likely doesnt end until the bowl game finishes, and we may be trying to avoid having to pay a buyout. Chip is in the playoff and may have incentives that are important to him (maybe loyalty to the coach). I can't pinpoint a reason for the delay with Yurcich other than negotiations being ongoing. I still think Chaney makes the most sense in regard to fit, but he'd have to hate working for Smart or fall in love with extra money we'd offer him, to come here. I don't know much about Chip Long, but if he was on Bama's radar last year, I'm sure he's on Pruitt's.
 
How about Clemson one short year later. He’s the architect of what we see annually in the playoffs...do anything for you?
Not really. That is the exception to the rule. Do you think gambling on a high school coach is a wise move given our current situation?
 
Thanks so much for responding, really appreciate the insight.

It's not really much insight. We're just dealing with a new HC finding his way. It's positive that Pruitt is adapting and evolving and not as positive how it's playing out with fans and the media. Given UT's past coaching searches, the process and public perception could have been managed better, but media relations and PR aren't UT's strength.
 
Sounds like smoke for either a bad search or unpopular candidate.

I would try to link the Traveller up with the guys being tossed around.

Until then Propst is my guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Weezer
It's not really much insight. We're just dealing with a new HC finding his way. It's positive that Pruitt is adapting and evolving and not as positive how it's playing out with fans and the media. Given UT's past coaching searches, the process and public perception could have been managed better, but media relations and PR aren't UT's strength.
Agree. But having some insight into why at least helps build understanding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Weezer and LA Vol
So, are we back to thinking that Pruitt knows what he's doing and hasn't been turned down by every coach currently in the NCAA?

I'm just trying to keep up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BJSforVols
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top