Amateur Hour Continues

I'm not sure what was "LOL" worthy or if you're attempting to dismiss the legal expert's opinions because you disagree with their opinions. I find it fascinating that you believe your "guess" holds more weight or what you think you know what a jury would find compelling.

I find it odd that you place faith in what "legal scholars" say in the media. Regardless of what outlet it is, these "legal scholars" will be supporting the outlets chosen narrative. I put more value into the opinion of the former head of the Federal Election Commission.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
Term limits would do it. If you can't run over and over and over, there is no need to raise money.
For individual politicians, yes. For the parties, no.

I'm all for term limits but it doesn't really solve the core problem. It is like having your yard infested with weeds, but instead of removing the weeds you just mow them. It looks better for a little bit, but then you have to mow it again.
 
The shutdown is coming. "strap in" - Trump

I find it funny that you are talking about shutting down the government while at 1pm today Trump is talking about passing bipartisan bills .🤔 #Resit . Hunker down mick , squeeze those little fits and butt checks together and refuse to work with Trump . He will just use it against you in 2020 . Lol
 
I hope he was clear enough for the redhats.






For Democrats that's manna from heaven. It may be the worst political maneuver a President has ever made.

Attn: Anyone interested in being COS. This guy has no control of what comes out of his mouth.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top