Amateur Hour Continues

#4,132
#4,132
Mick said:
Did trump violate campaign finance laws? We have a witness and documentation that he did. You don't care though.
Click to expand...
This is like asking how worked up we get if someone gets a speeding ticket. IF Trump violated campaign finance law, it'll be a fine just like it was for Obama and 1000s of politicians before them.
 
#4,136
#4,136
0nelilreb said:
I’m starting to believe what others are saying , your troll game is off . Did you hit your head or something ? Maybe drank too much soy milk at one time ? Oh I bet it’s that the economy is so good you can’t keep up with it and keep a fresh troll game . Uncle Donald is doing you right isn’t he 😁
Click to expand...

Since I haven't trolled anyone in eons and you guys are considering my posts "trolls" - I'd say that even when I'm literally off, my game is still very clearly tight.

You're telling on yourself when you float this kind of response - that is - I'm right and you know it but you don't want to get punked and feel like you'll soften the blow by claiming I'm trolling. I get why you're doing it but you should know it's not working.
 
#4,137
#4,137
Mick said:
Meaning the writers of the Constitution designed it to change and evolve = living. It is not a dead document.
Click to expand...
No, a living constitution is one in which the original meaning is interpreted to conform to today's trends and tastes, contrary to the ammendment process.
 
#4,139
#4,139
Septic said:
Since I haven't trolled anyone in eons and you guys are considering my posts "trolls" - I'd say that even when I'm literally off, my game is still very clearly tight.

You're telling on yourself when you float this kind of response - that is - I'm right and you know it but you don't want to get punked and feel like you'll soften the blow by claiming I'm trolling. I get why you're doing it but you should know it's not working.
Click to expand...

LOL
 
#4,140
#4,140
Septic said:
Since I haven't trolled anyone in eons and you guys are considering my posts "trolls" - I'd say that even when I'm literally off, my game is still very clearly tight.

You're telling on yourself when you float this kind of response - that is - I'm right and you know it but you don't want to get punked and feel like you'll soften the blow by claiming I'm trolling. I get why you're doing it but you should know it's not working.
Click to expand...

Well if you haven’t been trolling then you are just off . I’d stick with the trolling gig at least you got laughs when your game was fresh . I’m still sticking with the economy being so good from uncle Donald that you can’t keep up .
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#4,145
#4,145
hog88 said:
Legal scholars? LOL

Time will tell for sure, my guess is they never even attempt to charge him for this. They know it won't fly in front of a jury but it makes good political theater.
Click to expand...

Oh I think they will try if he or when he leaves office . I just don’t think they can do it while he’s a sitting president .
 
#4,147
#4,147
0nelilreb said:
Oh I think they will try if he or when he leaves office . I just don’t think they can do it while he’s a sitting president .
Click to expand...

Nah, don't see it. They would be inventing new legal standards and laws. This is theater, it's SDNY, the most corrupt district in the DOJ.
 
#4,149
#4,149
hog88 said:
Legal scholars? LOL

Time will tell for sure, my guess is they never even attempt to charge him for this. They know it won't fly in front of a jury but it makes good political theater.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what was "LOL" worthy or if you're attempting to dismiss the legal expert's opinions because you disagree with their opinions. I find it fascinating that you believe your "guess" holds more weight or what you think you know what a jury would find compelling.
 
#4,150
#4,150
Mick said:
It even provided the mechanism for interpretation as well as change.
Click to expand...
It's a, for the most part, readable document that simply outlines how the federal government will administrate, specific powers granted to the federal government and limitations to that power. Article 5 requires a laborious ammendment process to enact change.


Mick said:
It's not the Bible.
Click to expand...
It's certainly not perfect. The USSR had a similar constitution. A constitution is only as good as the plurality of voters. The illustrative lesson on the constitution is that the government cannot even follow its' own damn rules.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top