To be fair, someone else that *might know, made a comment, paraphrasing:Like I said it could be crap. Only time will tell if Briles gets the job.
Could be.I just think it's a fairly normal process, to start with whom you think is the strongest candidate, and move down the list accordingly. Whether they offered 1, 2, or 3, or any of them turned us down, but UT is still moving down a list of candidates, and ultimately we'll never fully know who the interviewed, in what order, or who the offered, and who they didn't, but given their foreknowledge of Helton being up for the WKU position, I can't imagine that Fulmer or Pruitt sat on their laurels and didn't start reaching out to the top candidate(s) as soon as possible.
I think the main focus of the tweet is common sense. If you nix Freeze because of baggage and negativity, that can be used against you, how could you turn straight to Briles and hire him.Is this Pennington? Wonder who he thinks we'll get with all those "strong opinions" he's tweeting? He knows as much as Simonton, Brice, Hubbs and the rest of those web soothsayers. I do agree with him one thing - He definitely could be wrong.
Maybe Freeze was nixed because more digging revealed more problems but the Briles vetting was a no further issues?I think the main focus of the tweet is common sense. If you nix Freeze because of baggage and negativity, that can be used against you, how could you turn straight to Briles and hire him.
What is going on with Briles. People on TOS acting like Pruitt blew up the deal over friend....any info...and looks like we are interviewing UCF OC
UCF has no OC listed ...
Football - Coaches - UCFKnights.com | UCF Knights Athletics
Not being contrary here ... who are we interviewing?
