Tuesday Practice Thread: Charlotte Week

#76
#76
Maybe Pruitt knows JB is a stud and he'll play on both sides. Maybe Pruitt is trying to motivate someone else by showing them that someone else could take their place if they don't bring 100% every snap. Maybe with the loss of Kongbo, Pruitt needs a backup who at least has a basic understanding on how to play the position. Maybe I don't have a clue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FĆÆreBall
#77
#77
Not as fast as Chandler but has the best instincts. Chandler is a good receiver but I'm not impressed with his ability as a runner.
Way more upside with Banks than Chandler.

giphy.gif
 
#79
#79
Maybe Pruitt knows JB is a stud and he'll play on both sides. Maybe Pruitt is trying to motivate someone else by showing them that someone else could take their place if they don't bring 100% every snap. Maybe with the loss of Kongbo, Pruitt needs a backup who at least has a basic understanding on how to play the position. Maybe I don't have a clue.
I think it has more to do with the idea that he has a mentality and an attitude that fits an LB. If he was the best RB or in the top 2 he's not requesting to be moved to LB IMO and Pruitt probably wouldn't jump at the chance to move him. He wants to get on the field like most FR do and after his fumble issues that wasn't going to happen the way he envisioned this year. I think its a good move for him and the team long term.
 
#82
#82
Let JG rest and heal, start and play KC first half, play Shrout second half ...if I had my wish.
Sounds like an end around to benching him...all under the auspice of concern. šŸ˜
 
#83
#83
Sounds like an end around to benching him...all under the auspice of concern. šŸ˜


I was thinking more along the lines of giving Shrout some game experience this year to level the playing field a little for the QB competition coming next year.
But I would rather JG be allowed to heal for the remainder of the schedule and hopefully get us to a bowl game.
 
#84
#84
I was thinking more along the lines of giving Shrout some game experience this year to level the playing field a little for the QB competition coming next year.
But I would rather JG be allowed to heal for the remainder of the schedule and hopefully get us to a bowl game.
JG needs his reps to if he’s going to play the remaining 3 SEC games. Sitting games out sets any QB back...no matter how established. If he’s healthy enough to play, inactivity is worse than risk of injury.
 
#85
#85
I think it has more to do with the idea that he has a mentality and an attitude that fits an LB. If he was the best RB or in the top 2 he's not requesting to be moved to LB IMO and Pruitt probably wouldn't jump at the chance to move him. He wants to get on the field like most FR do and after his fumble issues that wasn't going to happen the way he envisioned this year. I think its a good move for him and the team long term.

It's worked out well for Jennings.
 
#88
#88
Sounds like an end around to benching him...all under the auspice of concern. šŸ˜
Yes! "Rest" JG and then KC leads the Vols to victory against Charlotte which leads to a permanent benching of JG UNLESS KC doesnt get his completion % up above 75%... Makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USMC-TNVOL
#89
#89
If JJ Petersen is a pass rusher put him in will be something new I haven't seen from this defense. Something we need desperately.
 
#90
#90
It’s not the weight. He’s at least 225. He was 215 at the beginning of his senior year. He just doesn’t know the position so the rest of this season is about developing him there AND getting production from him elsewhere.
Banks is listed smaller on the Vols roster this year than his High School listings which probably means the High School listings were overstated.
 
#91
#91
Zero chance a guy averaging 4 ypc and fumbles every 4 to 5 touches will ever be considered the best running back on ANY roster. He's a couple of years away and that's if he stays at the rb position. If he puts on 20-25 lbs he's headed to MLB next year.
Some of his fumbles were due to trying to get extra yards. This can be coached out of him and is not hard to do. Many running backs have had fumbling issues at one time in their career which were corrected.
 
#92
#92
That's an interesting opinion for sure. I'd be curious to know exactly what it is about Chandler's ability as a runner that doesn't impress you since Chandler's ability as a running back is arguably the best of any running back on the team. Tim Jordan has really stepped up his game and makes a strong case too. Carlin Fils-Aime has elevated his already lengthy skill set as a running back as well as averages over 6 yards a carry with a touchdown with only 3 touches so far this season, and Madre London also averages over 5 yards a carry if I remember right and ran for a lot of first downs on third down. Yes, Banks has a lot of upside, but that doesn't take anything away from Chandler who has already established himself or the other backs who are showing they're just as ready and willing to compete.

No matter how it all shakes out, in my opinion, we've got a talented group of running backs who play hard and like they're eager to earn opportunities to help the team win however they are called on to do so when their number is called. It looks obvious to me that running backs Coach Chris Weinke is doing a fine job developing their talent. I am sure Banks will continue to get the opportunity to drill points of contact fundamental ball security drills so often and so regularly until protecting the football with correct technique becomes a reinforced habit he chooses to stay mindful of even though he'll eventually drill it to the point he does it without needing to think about it, because it's so important to his continued development. I am just as impressed as you are about his talent running the ball which is why it is so important that he demonstrates he has mastered the points of contact so that all his otherwise obvious talent for the position doesn't go to waste. It's not anything that happens without the drilling with emphasis, so we'll know he's got the technique down when the fumbles stop and not at any point before that proof. Yes, it's fun to dream about what it would be like to already be at point B without starting at point A first, but that's just not the process. I'm willing to bet Coach Weinke has some tips to take that weakness and transform it into one of his biggest strengths so that a case of "the drops" never has the chance to rear its ugly head again for Banks or any of the backs.

On that note, it was impressive how the team didn't commit a single turnover vs. South Carolina. A lot of teams shoot themselves in the foot with turnovers and penalties that cost them games against teams that have no business beating them. Even though we lost the penalties battle last Saturday, I'm happy that it looks like Tennessee is developing into a team that will be so disciplined in the fundamentals of mistake-free football, that the staff, team, and fans take pride in it as one of the trademarks of Tennessee Volunteers football under Coach Pruitt and his staff. That's when the fun really begins with beating teams favored to win (like the victory over Auburn already this season) and make a point out of doing it as consistently if not more consistently than any other team in the country. I like what Coach Pruitt said in the press conference about making the other team earn it when it comes to any success another team gets against Tennessee.
Chandler looks good when he is in open space but I do not see him following blocks and making good runs in tight windows like better than average running backs. I consider Chandler just an average back with some speed.
 
#93
#93
Banks is listed smaller on the Vols roster this year than his High School listings which probably means the High School listings were overstated.
Or the Vols roster is understated...and they don’t allow for gains during the season.
 
#94
#94
Some of his fumbles were due to trying to get extra yards. This can be coached out of him and is not hard to do. Many running backs have had fumbling issues at one time in their career which were corrected.
Doesn't matter where they came from, fact is he's fumbled every game so far that he's had touches, thus he can't be relied on at this time for critical carries and for these reasons cannot be categorized as our best back. Just because he plays hard does not make him great. Does he have potential, absolutely, but he will never be considered the best back on our roster unless guys go down in front of him.
 
#95
#95
Doesn't matter where they came from, fact is he's fumbled every game so far that he's had touches, thus he can't be relied on at this time for critical carries and for these reasons cannot be categorized as our best back. Just because he plays hard does not make him great. Does he have potential, absolutely, but he will never be considered the best back on our roster unless guys go down in front of him.
I did not say he is the best back today. He has more upside and looks like he may be the best long-term SEC caliber back we have on the current roster.
 
#97
#97
I did not say he is the best back today. He has more upside and looks like he may be the best long-term SEC caliber back we have on the current roster.
Whatever, hard to understand as you have a post in this thread where you state he is the best RB on our roster. Can't debate with someone talking out of both ends.
 
#98
#98
Whatever, hard to understand as you have a post in this thread where you state he is the best RB on our roster. Can't debate with someone talking out of both ends.
Read the original post. I stated excluding the current fumble issues he is the best back. I believe the fumbling can be coached out of him.
 
#99
#99
Read the original post. I stated excluding the current fumble issues he is the best back. I believe the fumbling can be coached out of him.
My argument is that you can't overlook a players fault, or a person's per say and consider them the best if they have a negative trait that can't be denied. He simply can't be considered the best rb on the roster because of his fumbling problem.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top