Kavanaugh Confirmation

#9,326
#9,326
So what's the scope? Interviews with the 5 named people from Ford (including her)?

Ford's lawyers asked if they leaked? DiFi's staff asked if they leaked?
 
#9,329
#9,329
TheDeeble said:
D will want everything. Go door to door interviewing neighbors about parties that may have happened in the 80s. Asking liquor store owners if Kavanaugh attempted to buy while underage.

As long and slow of a delay as they can get. And when it doesn't go as slow as they want, they'll claim not enough investigation was attempted and the vote can't be held.
Click to expand...

Where will you find the neighbors?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL_79
#9,332
#9,332
I will bet any amount that the FBI complete their 302s, add them to the file, and Schumer will insist that the nomination needs to go back to the committee before it can go to the floor for a vote.
 
#9,334
#9,334
Grand Vol said:
Awww, poor baby. Crying about this after trying to destroy a man's life over politics.

Senate Judiciary Committee advances Kavanaugh nomination in party-line vote
Click to expand...

F*** her what a f****** c***!!!! The R's better strap on their scorched Earth don't give a s*** big boy boots and start burying these people, by any means necessary. I mean ruin them, and be willing to ruin their families and friends as well. Not kidding, you want to play games, fine, it's time the game was played to be won. I immediately hire the best hackers that money can buy, and I start building leverage that even J.E. Hoover would be envious of.

They think that they can run rampid playing with people's lives, so, I show them what somebody with true balls, backbone, and conviction is willing to do. No emotion, cold, calculated, and full on Kayser soze.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#9,336
#9,336
Anybody notice the helplessness and desperation? The democrats sat on this for weeks, used it to try to procedure/stall the Rs out of a pick, and we're hearing begging for "olive branches" on here.
 
#9,338
#9,338
volinbham said:
So what's the scope? Interviews with the 5 named people from Ford (including her)?

Ford's lawyers asked if they leaked? DiFi's staff asked if they leaked?
Click to expand...


Well, not if they tell them to go to hell. LOL Why in the world would those people want to be interviewed again or provide anything which then can be used against them?

Really all the FBI can do is go back over the background check, there really isn't an investigation, unless one of those people recants... then they themselves could be on the hook for perjury or lying to an agent. Doubt this gets done in a week or even two or possibly ever. LOL

I would just ask Ford, can fly out here to talk to us? LOL
 
#9,339
#9,339
Orange_Crush said:
So you don't trust the system? You trust that confused testimony that couldn't give a shred of detail that would make her accusations testable more than you trust the constitutional process to confirm a SC justice, and remove if needed?

Or do you suspect that he doesn't deserve it based on ideological and party reasons?
Click to expand...

I don't agree with him ideologically, but I found her testimony to be as credible as his. I found issues with both, but I think the FBI could look into the "facts" brought by their testimony and conduct a short investigation and give him a clean "bill of health." It's too important a position leave rocks unturned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#9,340
#9,340
LSU-SIU said:
Well, not if they tell them to go to hell. LOL Why in the world would those people want to be interviewed again or provide anything which then can be used against them?

Really all the FBI can do is go back over the background check, there really isn't an investigation, unless one of those people recants... then they themselves could be on the hook for perjury or lying to an agent. Doubt this gets done in a week or even two or possibly ever. LOL
Click to expand...
go






fund






them
 
#9,344
#9,344
TheDeeble said:
Yes, you'd think if someone had that allegation, the Democrats would want to get that investigation started immediately when it was known.

Not 6 weeks later just before the vote. There's your partisanship.
Click to expand...

So? Ignore politics and just make sure you get someone that is deserving of the position.
 
#9,348
#9,348
ClearwaterVol said:
I don't agree with him ideologically, but I found her testimony to be as credible as his. I found issues with both, but I think the FBI could look into the "facts" brought by their testimony and conduct a short investigation and give him a clean "bill of health." It's too important a position leave rocks unturned.
Click to expand...
When it comes to things like this, I try not to be partisan. I know that women can lie about such matters. I have seen it. I would just say that I have no idea who to believe and they both made a good case for themselves. It is disappointing to see that this is breaking down along party lines.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top