JAllen18
VFL
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2006
- Messages
- 6,694
- Likes
- 14,555
We saw different games. I saw a tightly conservative called game with tight players who got dominated in their heads right out of the gate.
Pruitt spent both open periods on Tuesday on the offensive field. He swung by tight-end drills before spending nearly a full period watching the offensive line work and then went over to where the quarterbacks and wide receivers were working on various formations and route combinations. It certainly is notable a defensive coach like Pruitt spent so much time on the offensive side of the ball when he's almost always working with the defense.
It’ll never work until you get elite athletes that you develop. Which will probably be around year 4. The next 3 years will be miserable if they don’t adjust and adapt, like every other great coach
“I don’t read a blog. If I hear something bad about me it’s coming from the street or something like that,” Gran said last week. “Somebody might flip me off or whatever. I don’t know, whatever. I don’t worry about that. I really don’t. We can score 50 and we didn’t run the ball enough. We could score 30 and we didn’t pass the ball enough.”
This season hasn’t been as smooth offensively with offensive line attrition and less production in the running back room, but the Cats have offset a portion of the ground game with an improved passing attack.
That adaptability might be Gran’s strength as an offensive coordinator. And it changes from week to week. Johnson attempted a career-high 36 passes against Missouri, and just 15 against Tennessee on Saturday. The Cats thought they could run on the Vols and it worked.
Gran was criticized for his conservative play calling at the beginning of the season. Kentucky debuted a few new formations against Tennessee and ran two trick plays. No one’s calling him conservative anymore.
What do you mean, stop making excuses?Ok, but good teams don’t do that. Stop making excuses
I'm not arguing against the necessity of elite athletes but Kentucky is playing with a first year 3 star JUCO QB, a RS FR low 3 star at LT, a true SO at center, and a 2 star RG. Of course they do have Benny Snell but what else?
I think the key to Kentucky's offensive success so far this year may be because this is the 3rd year for long time OC Eddie Gran as the OC for the cats. His first couple years he got a lot of criticism.
This from last year:
I'm not arguing against the necessity of elite athletes but Kentucky is playing with a first year 3 star JUCO QB, a RS FR low 3 star at LT, a true SO at center, and a 2 star RG. Of course they do have Benny Snell but what else?
I think the key to Kentucky's offensive success so far this year may be because this is the 3rd year for long time OC Eddie Gran as the OC for the cats. His first couple years he got a lot of criticism.
This from last year:
Certainly not much of anything to paint as a rosy picture from Saturday. Very little you can point to and say that it looked good. However, the TO's are not a direct cause-and-effect of how they are being coached. And the 6 TO's are HUGELY responsible for the apparent size of the gap between UF and UT right now. The scoreboard is not an indication of that gap. Very skewed. That is not to really call to light anything positive for us. We have a LONG ways to go. Trench play on offense is abysmal. But UF is not nearly that far ahead. We GAVE them points. They had no sustained drives until game was over and we had essentially given up. Franks' numbers were terrible. Their run game was not good. DB's were very suspect outside of Henderson. But their LB's and DL definitely owned our OL.I think most people thought this year would be a struggle. As far as beating Florida, hard to blame Pruitt's coaching for 6 Turnovers.
Those decisions were reactionary...big difference. We were not attacking, not proactively going balls out and taking the fight to them from the opening play. That is the problem i saw.I would hardly call the early onside kick and 4th down attempts conservative. As for wrinkles and trick plays, don't know, haven't seen anything to confirm that we have those. Did see a tight team though, like what tends to happen when everyone is worried about 'special' games.
Pruitt's whiteboard felt the importance though.
Those decisions were reactionary...big difference. We were not attacking, not proactively going balls out and taking the fight to them from the opening play. That is the problem i saw.
Those decisions were reactionary...big difference. We were not attacking, not proactively going balls out and taking the fight to them from the opening play. That is the problem i saw.
There’s a difference in using the word liberal and using the political term “left wing”. whether it was intentional or not he made it political by using that phrase.Left wing just refers to liberal, meaning a "liberal" interpretation or over regulation. It doesn't refer to a political stance on a topic. It absolutely makes sense.
Yes, I agree to a point. As others have said in the past though, you can tell in the first two years just based off how the team plays. At some point, a coach has to win a toss up game.
That's why I thought Butch was going to be solid with the team's win against USC and performance against UGA in 2013. He outperformed. 2015 was ok,, and then the end of 2016 just fell apart. But, Pruitt has to beat a couple of Vandy, UK, Mizzou, SC the next two years to show he can coach.
8 turnovers in 4 games. Feels like we have progressively gotten worse on offense.
I'm definitely not out on Pruitt. I'm a little concerned about offensive strategy by Will Friend and Tyson Helton or whomever is taking ownership of directing our offense.I don’t think anyone is “out” on him because of it, but it set any good will he had built back to zero. Just my opinion.