Kavanaugh Confirmation

#2,351
#2,351
bamawriter said:
It's what she told the Washington Post.

"Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband."
Click to expand...

I'm wondering why nobody has asked the obvious question of DiFi yet...

"Did you at any point during the six weeks the letter was in your possession contact Mrs. Ford for additional details as she requested?"
 
#2,352
#2,352
All of these people on both sides who claim to know for certain whether it happened or not look pretty foolish to me.
 
#2,353
#2,353
evillawyer said:
Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012
Click to expand...

You're grasping. Her story is falling apart. It's becoming more obvious this is a Dem ploy. You know it, you just don't want to admit it.

At what point to you admit what's going on here and call it wrong?
 
#2,355
#2,355
Brzezinski: GOP Letting Ford Testify, But Dems ‘Moving the Goalpost’

With Supreme Court justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation on hold amid Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations of sexual assault decades ago, MSNBC “Morning Joe” co-host Mika Brzezinski argued that Democrats were “moving the goalpost” on Republicans because they want to allow Ford the chance to testify and now they are not cooperating.
 
#2,358
#2,358
lawgator1 said:
All of these people on both sides who claim to know for certain whether it happened or not look pretty foolish to me.
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter at this point, if she won't testify it's over, he will get confirmed then thankfully we can move past yet another left wing hoax
 
#2,359
#2,359
Franklin Pierce said:
Brzezinski: GOP Letting Ford Testify, But Dems ‘Moving the Goalpost’

With Supreme Court justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation on hold amid Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations of sexual assault decades ago, MSNBC “Morning Joe” co-host Mika Brzezinski argued that Democrats were “moving the goalpost” on Republicans because they want to allow Ford the chance to testify and now they are not cooperating.
Click to expand...
When Democrats have lost Mika......
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb, NorthDallas40 and SLICKYINC
#2,363
#2,363
Both parties are out of control, and have been for some time. But the Dems have ramped it up to new levels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt2496
#2,364
#2,364
NYT ISSUES CORRECTION AFTER MISREPORTING ON KAVANAUGH ALLEGATIONS

The New York Times issued a correction on Tuesday after incorrectly reporting that Brett Kavanaugh’s friend remembered him allegedly sexually assaulting a girl in high school.

Dr. Christine Ford claimed that Kavanaugh groped her at a party over three decades ago and that Kavanaugh’s friend, Mark Judge, was a witness to the incident.

NYT reported Tuesday that Ford wants the FBI to investigate her claim prior to testifying in a Senate hearing. They erroneously stated in that article that Judge recalls the alleged incident.

Judge has actually said that he does not remember the incident in question and that the allegations are “absolutely nuts.”
​
“Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Ford’s letter. More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes,” Judge said in a statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The New York Times added a correction to the bottom of their piece, explaining, “An earlier version of this article misstated what Mark Judge told the Senate Judiciary Committee. He said that he does not remember the episode, not that he does.”

NYT Issues Correction After Misreporting On Kavanaugh Allegations
 
#2,365
#2,365
Weezer said:
Been broken for a long time, but really should have been evident when Dems started their hissy fit when Hillary didn't get her turn.
Click to expand...
As a person with the hissy fit, it wasn't about Hilary losing, (we didn't have much to chose between) it was the POS that Republicans chose out of 15 people. But that is old news. Most would have moved on if he would act like half a human.
 
#2,366
#2,366
Mick said:
So you don't think it will sway anyone?
Click to expand...
I'll say this and hopefully you'll understand what I'm saying. If Dr. Ford and her attorney make the rounds on the Sunday shows and fail to show up on Monday, then I think the opinions will be swayed in the direction that she's FOS.
 
#2,369
#2,369
SLICKYINC said:
I'll say this and hopefully you'll understand what I'm saying. If Dr. Ford and her attorney make the rounds on the Sunday shows and fail to show up on Monday, then I think the opinions will be swayed in the direction that she's FOS.
Click to expand...
I just think that she is a typical crazy female. We have all known some. I'm not saying they are all crazy, but...………………....
 
#2,370
#2,370
#2,371
#2,371
Franklin Pierce said:
NYT ISSUES CORRECTION AFTER MISREPORTING ON KAVANAUGH ALLEGATIONS

The New York Times issued a correction on Tuesday after incorrectly reporting that Brett Kavanaugh’s friend remembered him allegedly sexually assaulting a girl in high school.

Dr. Christine Ford claimed that Kavanaugh groped her at a party over three decades ago and that Kavanaugh’s friend, Mark Judge, was a witness to the incident.

NYT reported Tuesday that Ford wants the FBI to investigate her claim prior to testifying in a Senate hearing. They erroneously stated in that article that Judge recalls the alleged incident.

Judge has actually said that he does not remember the incident in question and that the allegations are “absolutely nuts.”
​
“Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Ford’s letter. More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes,” Judge said in a statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The New York Times added a correction to the bottom of their piece, explaining, “An earlier version of this article misstated what Mark Judge told the Senate Judiciary Committee. He said that he does not remember the episode, not that he does.”

NYT Issues Correction After Misreporting On Kavanaugh Allegations
Click to expand...

Very "convenient" of them.
 
#2,373
#2,373
Grand Vol said:
I, as well as plenty of others, have said he deserved a hearing and up or down vote

But, as Hillary once said, what difference at this point does it make?
Click to expand...
And some of us have also stated he would be an excellent candidate to replace Aunt Ruthie when the time comes. I’ll still stand by that.
 
#2,375
#2,375
JCP201 said:
As a person with the hissy fit, it wasn't about Hilary losing, (we didn't have much to chose between) it was the POS that Republicans chose out of 15 people. But that is old news. Most would have moved on if he would act like half a human.
Click to expand...

Can't really criticize the other sides option when your side offered no better.

I don't think there was a good option, but Trump won. Thus far I've yet to see anything warranting impeachment. "I don't like him" is certainly not grounds. If you don't want him re-elected, find a better option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top