Kavanaugh Confirmation

#2,301
#2,301
bamawriter said:
With you being a lawyer, I'm surprised you're so careless with a word like "corroborating."

Despite the length of the letter, the entirety of the "corroboration" is this sentence and a half: "This incident did happen. Many of us heard about it at school..."

Who did Ms King hear it from? What did that person know of the incident and how did he or she know it?

She spends more time talking about getting stood up by Mark Judge than she does "corroborating" the incident. I also find it interesting that she asked a guy to prom despite having heard that he participated in an attempted sexual assault.
Click to expand...

He/she/it isn't a lawyer. It is Outerbank Vol's new account since things got too hot for his/her/its other account and his/her/its crazy started showing bigly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaybird_1981
#2,302
#2,302
Just heard a news blip (can't find it in press yet) that an offer has been extended to interview Ford at a place of her choosing to get her side of the story prior to K testimony on Monday.

Also saw in an article that Ford is claiming therapist transcribed their sessions incorrectly to explain the discrepancy between claiming it was 4 people and now 2 people.
 
#2,305
#2,305
"A federal law enforcement official told Fox News Ford's insistence on a FBI probe is "totally inappropriate."
"It's totally inappropriate for someone to demand we use law enforcement resources to investigate a 35-year-old allegation when she won't go under oath and can't remember key details including when or where it happened," the official said.
A highly-placed law enforcement source also said there won’t be a FBI investigation because there are no allegations a federal crime was committed. The bureau has also already conducted a background investigation.
“This is a political issue, not a law enforcement one,” the law enforcement source said."

"The FBI has indicated to the committee and in public statements that it considers the matter closed," Grassley and other top Republicans wrote. "The FBI does not make credibility determinations. The FBI provides information on a confidential basis in order for decision makers to determine an individual’s suitability. The Senate has the information it needs to follow up with witnesses and gather and assess the relevant evidence."

Trump says ‘we'll have to make a decision’ on Kavanaugh’s future if accuser gives ‘credible’ testimony
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood and NorthDallas40
#2,315
#2,315
JCP201 said:
The truth is, even if Democrats win by a landslide, the President is still going to pick a Republican type nominee. Isn't it better to make sure this guy is fit to be on our Supreme Court for years to come?
Click to expand...

Been done before his last lifetime appointment.
 
#2,318
#2,318
CABVOL said:
I mean, I just posted it on the internet, therefore, it must be 100% factual.
Click to expand...

CABVOL said:
He/she/it isn't a lawyer. It is Outerbank Vol's new account since things got too hot for his/her/its other account and his/her/its crazy started showing bigly.
Click to expand...

I demand the FBI investigate this matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83, Obsessed and NorthDallas40
#2,320
#2,320
Another hold up a minute quote. So let me get this straight. DiFi was the only person who had this info and then she personally handed this info over to the FBI. So she’s saying between the time she personally had this info and the hand off to the FBI that it got leaked to the press. Just how stupid do they think people really are? The derp is strong with this one.


 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#2,322
#2,322
Some random thoughts:

1. FBI/Background checks. K. held the highest security clearance one can hold (other than POTUS and perhaps a few select others). The background check there would interviews with people that knew him as a child, teen, adult. They talk to people you went to school with, your teachers, etc. In short, virtually anyone the FBI would talk to know have already been talked to. They are asked open ended questions about anything they know about the subject and are probed if they've ever heard anything about misdeeds. His record is clean and there is nothing in the file about this. The Dems have the file. If this incident was widely known when it happened the odds are tiny that someone in those background checks wouldn't have mentioned hearing "something". And no, they don't just interview the subject's friends. Which takes us to point 2.

2. The temporary "corroborator" of the story claims everyone knew about the incident right around the time it happened. This conflicts with no hint of it in the background check and the ever changing narrative of the accuser (whether from her mouth or her advocates) that she didn't tell anyone at the time, that these were repressed memories, etc.

The FBI investigation has already been done. What's left is for the accuser and accused to be heard from and questioned.
 
#2,323
#2,323
SLICKYINC said:
Another hold up a minute quote. So let me get this straight. DiFi was the only person who had this info and then she personally handed this info over to the FBI. So she’s saying between the time she personally had this info and the hand off to the FBI that it got leaked to the press. Just how stupid do they think people really are? The derp is strong with this one.


Click to expand...


Reminds me of the underwear gnomes.

Phase 1: collect underpants
Phase 2: ?
Phase 3: profit!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#2,325
#2,325
#VFL__ said:
Why can’t you just accept the fact that this guy may have sexually assaulted someone? Instead of turning it into some fing libtard ploy. JFC
Click to expand...

The why is simple. The accuser is following along with the Dem playbook rather than actually offering up testimony. It could have happened and IF it did, it's wrong. But the supposed victim is using her accusation as a political tool. That absolutely leads to people questioning her veracity. She's not seeking to put her truth out there. She's seeking to delay confirmation hearings. Her name is out there. Her story is out there. She either needs to testify to Congress or fade away. That choice is hers to make. **** or get off the pot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and Hoosier_Vol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top