508mikey
$$$$$$
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2011
- Messages
- 62,618
- Likes
- 52,330
2. Extra emphasis will be placed on Strength of Schedule for the 2 wildcard teams. I'm more impressed with a team going 2-1 against Bama, Auburn, and UGA than 3-0 against a bunch of Big 10 teams.
I would love this. 9 conference games and 1 P5 OOC and 1 cupcake.
What if a team went 3-0 against Penn St, Ohio St, and Michigan St/Michigan/Wisconsin?
I get the Big 10 hate, but geez. They are a good conference, and were probably better/deeper than the SEC in 2015 and 2016.
And who else? You stopped at 11.
I would like to see 6-1-2. That way every 6 years we have played everyone home and away. 1 P5 and 2 school choice games.
I would also like to see us drop back to 12 teams and keep the 9 game conference schedule but that will never happen.
Another option is to drop to 10 teams and play everyone every year. Don't know what to do with the "required" Conference Championship game though.
Im not sure about the 9 conference games... but if you had a 5 team playoff.. you could possibly get a non power five team in or another conference champion and you let the #1 have a by so it adds drama to the #1 seed and to the 5/6 seed... most importantly... it rewards the #1 team in the country.
If we do not draw a hard line in the sand it will only be another decade or so and CFP's will be like march madness.
4 is a good number. If it must be expanded go-to 6 and give the top 2 a bye.
And who else? You stopped at 11.
I would like to see 6-1-2. That way every 6 years we have played everyone home and away. 1 P5 and 2 school choice games.
I would also like to see us drop back to 12 teams and keep the 9 game conference schedule but that will never happen.
Another option is to drop to 10 teams and play everyone every year. Don't know what to do with the "required" Conference Championship game though.
It sounds good for the conference, but the rest of the nation already criticizes the SEC for a lack of willingness to play out of conference games especially top ten opponents. We'll really hear it then. Considering the strength of schedule aspect is this the direction the SEC wants to go? Not pushing for this, just asking.
Yes and Id like to see everybody get 2 permanent cross division rival to even it up a little.
Vols should have Bama and Ole Miss every year.
UGA should have Auburn and Arkansas or TAMU.
FLA should have LSU and MSU (because Mullen)
If I were in charge....If I was in charge....:thumbsup:
1. 8 team playoff (5 conference champs, 2 wildcards, and Top non Power 5 team)
2. Extra emphasis will be placed on Strength of Schedule for the 2 wildcard teams. I'm more impressed with a team going 2-1 against Bama, Auburn, and UGA than 3-0 against a bunch of Big 10 teams. Hell, Butch Jones went undefeated against the Big 10 West.
3. A 9 game conference schedule
4. An annual SEC - (Pac 12 or Big 10, etc. ) Challenge. Teams with 4 home conference games would have a home game in the Challenge. Teams with 5 home games will have a road game. Teams with legislatively mandated Power 5 nonconference games (UF-FSU; USC-Clemson; UK-Louisville, UGA-GT) can be excluded should they choose. A team must play a total of 10 Power 5 games each year.
5. 2 cupcake games. None against FCS schools.
I don't care about playing tough schedules. Tough schedules don't bother me. Bring it on.
However, I don't want a system where my school gets to play the schedule they do while other schools get to play the schedules they do.
Playing 9 conference games and Florida State while I watch a team like Wisconsin play one team in its 12 game schedule that ended the season ranked (and that was Northwestern).....hell, no.
Either we all play quality schedules or I'm not signing up for Murderer's Row.