Special counsel Mueller charges 12 Russian intelligence officers with hacking Democra

Let us not forget


| ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄|

john podesta's
password was
password

|___________|
(\__/) ||
(•ㅅ•) ||
/   づ
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
let us not forget


| ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄|

john podesta's
password was
password

|___________|
(\__/) ||
(•ㅅ•) ||
/   づ


(•ㅅ•)

b.o.o.b.i.e.s
 
"I'll have more flexibility after the election."

28863817.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The problem is that Trump knows that Dems would immediately use his admission that Russia meddled to go down the conspiracy road and delegitimize everything he's done and then run on it in the midterms.

Welcome to politicized foreign policy.

I'm pretty sure they'll try that anyway.

They don't have a message to voters, so might as well make something up.
 

Funny thing about that DNC server that nobody has come up with a good answer to.

If this was such a threat, specifically the foreign intervention, why would the FBI or other three letter agency accept their "no" answer for the evidence?

Furthermore, since when has the FBI or other three letter federal agency not used national security as a cover all for "we're taking it, ****er, because national security and you can EAD if you don't like it"?

Most curious...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Mueller should indict all 144,000,000 Russians. That would be impressive. It’s a slam dunk for Mueller as not a single one of them would see a day in court and challenge anything that he has to say. And despite 144,000,000 indictments there would still be no collusion
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
Mueller should indict all 144,000,000 Russians. That would be impressive. It’s a slam dunk for Mueller as not a single one of them would see a day in court and challenge anything that he has to say. And despite 144,000,000 indictments there would still be no collusion

Don't know if this has been said, but, Trump could make some sort of deal with Putin to bring back a few of these Russians named in the indictment next week for their day in court. Let them go through the discovery process of the evidence. I bet the charges would go away faster than a Krispy Kreme in front of Michael Moore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Not sure if posted, but it'd be funny if Putin tells Trump during the meeting he'll be glad to send a couple of GRU officers over to testify in court.

First question: "Please show me the evidence of us hacking. We'd like to see the server, please."

I'd love to see the look on their faces.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump - 6h

The stories you heard about the 12 Russians yesterday took place during the Obama Administration, not the Trump administration. Why didn't they do something about it, especially when it was reported that President Obama was informed by the FBI in September, before the Election?

************************************

This is yet another version of the same tweet he sends every time a Russian is specifically implicated in the meddling into the 2016 election. He follows the same course:

* There is no condemnation of Russia or Putin for their acts. He doesn't blame the Russians for doing it, he only blames Obama for not stopping it.

* But that is inconsistent with his stance on the meddling itself. He still won't publicly acknowledge Russia's meddling and he will still, once again, "ask" Putin if Russia did it on Monday rather than simply confronting him with the conclusions of our intelligence community. Like many things, Trump wants to have it both ways: He wants to publicly blame Obama but he doesn't want to publicly admit that the Russian hack actually occurred.

* Obama has answered the question posed in his tweet many times. He has done something which Trump never does. He has admitted to a mistake in judgment. He has said that he should have taken steps to counter what Russia was doing but he didn't. He was sensitive to the perception that any efforts he took would be perceived as an attempt to help Hillary Clinton and he thought she would win anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump - 6h

The stories you heard about the 12 Russians yesterday took place during the Obama Administration, not the Trump administration. Why didn't they do something about it, especially when it was reported that President Obama was informed by the FBI in September, before the Election?

************************************

This is yet another version of the same tweet he sends every time a Russian is specifically implicated in the meddling into the 2016 election. He follows the same course:

* There is no condemnation of Russia or Putin for their acts. He doesn't blame the Russians for doing it, he only blames Obama for not stopping it.

* But that is inconsistent with his stance on the meddling itself. He still won't publicly acknowledge Russia's meddling and he will still, once again, "ask" Putin if Russia did it on Monday rather than simply confronting him with the conclusions of our intelligence community. Like many things, Trump wants to have it both ways: He wants to publicly blame Obama but he doesn't want to publicly admit that the Russian hack actually occurred.

* Obama has answered the question posed in his tweet many times. He has done something which Trump never does. He has admitted to a mistake in judgment. He has said that he should have taken steps to counter what Russia was doing but he didn't. He was sensitive to the perception that any efforts he took would be perceived as an attempt to help Hillary Clinton and he thought she would win anyway.

So, you slept in the waded up jimmies.......
 
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump - 6h

The stories you heard about the 12 Russians yesterday took place during the Obama Administration, not the Trump administration. Why didn't they do something about it, especially when it was reported that President Obama was informed by the FBI in September, before the Election?

************************************

This is yet another version of the same tweet he sends every time a Russian is specifically implicated in the meddling into the 2016 election. He follows the same course:

* There is no condemnation of Russia or Putin for their acts. He doesn't blame the Russians for doing it, he only blames Obama for not stopping it.

* But that is inconsistent with his stance on the meddling itself. He still won't publicly acknowledge Russia's meddling and he will still, once again, "ask" Putin if Russia did it on Monday rather than simply confronting him with the conclusions of our intelligence community. Like many things, Trump wants to have it both ways: He wants to publicly blame Obama but he doesn't want to publicly admit that the Russian hack actually occurred.

* Obama has answered the question posed in his tweet many times. He has done something which Trump never does. He has admitted to a mistake in judgment. He has said that he should have taken steps to counter what Russia was doing but he didn't. He was sensitive to the perception that any efforts he took would be perceived as an attempt to help Hillary Clinton and he thought she would win anyway.


The tweet literally said that it happened during Obama's administration... Thus he admits it happened.


It literally asks why Obama didn't do anything about it--thus, it was wrong and should have been stopped.


Reading comprehension, BB. It saves a lot of heartburn.


It's facts and questions that should be dealt with, by the way. The funny thing is... trump's Twitter is more powerful than the MSM. He has 20 million followers seeing these tweets every time he tweets. then, for non-followers like me, even we see his tweets when libs and the MSM broadcast them all over the internet like you just did.


lol


He's using you as his pawn. You're taking his message to the public. Congrats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
Don't know if this has been said, but, Trump could make some sort of deal with Putin to bring back a few of these Russians named in the indictment next week for their day in court. Let them go through the discovery process of the evidence. I bet the charges would go away faster than a Krispy Kreme in front of Michael Moore.


Lol, yeah right. He doesn't want those witnesses against him anywhere near US authorities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Not sure if posted, but it'd be funny if Putin tells Trump during the meeting he'll be glad to send a couple of GRU officers over to testify in court.

First question: "Please show me the evidence of us hacking. We'd like to see the server, please."

I'd love to see the look on their faces.


Trump doesn't want more witnesses against him.

#nocollusion
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
He has admitted to a mistake in judgment. He has said that he should have taken steps to counter what Russia was doing but he didn't. He was sensitive to the perception that any efforts he took would be perceived as an attempt to help Hillary Clinton and he thought she would win anyway.

So he intentionally let Russia interfere knowing what they were doing?

It conveniently makes a nice insurance policy should she lose that the Dems would use the next few years to sow distrust and discontent.
 
Advertisement













Back
Top