Special counsel Mueller charges 12 Russian intelligence officers with hacking Democra

He's our liberal conspiracy theorist. I admit that. But he does spin a much better yarn that the GOP conspiracy theorists. He's actually fun to read because he brings a wealth of factual information and he usually sources it to reputable sources (NY Times, etc.). I read him for his knowledge of the dots, not how he connects the dots.

beauty is in the eye of the beholder I guess but the logic displayed (or lack of I should say) in that tweet sequence should call much into question.
 
How weird? If you ever criticized Obama it was because you were racist. If you ever agree with something Trump does... well you guys get the idea

Honestly I am just glad we’ve gotten back to a simpler time when disagreeing with the president doesn’t automatically make you a racist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Honestly I am just glad we’ve gotten back to a simpler time when disagreeing with the president doesn’t automatically make you a racist.

Now disagreeing with the President makes you cool. Now you can go on TV and say “**** Trump” and people shrug their shoulders. If the person who is so often called a NAZI or fascist was really those things would he allow people to do that without retribution? I don’t think so.
 
In a speech on the morning of July 27, 2016, Donald Trump encouraged Russian hackers to find e-mails that had been deleted from Hillary Clinton's private server that she used while serving as Secretary of State. He made this following statement during the speech:

"I will tell you this, Russia: If you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing," Trump said at a press conference in Florida. "I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press."

They were listening to you, Donald.

Mueller's indictment states that on July 27, 2016, - the same day as Trump's press conference - Russian hackers, "for the first time," attempted to break into Hillary Clinton's personal e-mail accounts, including those used by Clinton's personal office. Notably, the indictment specifies that the hack happened in the evening, heavily implying that the Russian hackers were responding to Trump's request.

Trump later claimed that he was just joking but it definitely seems that Russian officials were taking his every word very seriously, and doing anything they could to appease him. Unbelievable story.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
In a speech on the morning of July 27, 2016, Donald Trump encouraged Russian hackers to find e-mails that had been deleted from Hillary Clinton's private server that she used while serving as Secretary of State. He made this following statement during the speech:

"I will tell you this, Russia: If you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing," Trump said at a press conference in Florida. "I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press."

They were listening to you, Donald.

Mueller's indictment states that on July 27, 2016, - the same day as Trump's press conference - Russian hackers, "for the first time," attempted to break into e-mail accounts, including those used by Clinton's personal office. Notably, the indictment specifies that the hack happened in the evening, heavily implying that the Russian hackers were responding to Trump's request.

Trump later claimed that he was just joking but it definitely seems that Russian officials were taking his every word very seriously, and doing anything they could to appease him. Unbelievable story.

Good Grief.......did you just get off the window......this weak arse talking point is old already.......go to the strip club.....
 
My speculation is that Mueller is throwing out meaningless indictments that will go nowhere but seem awesome. He has already indicted Manafort and Flynn on unrelated charges. He is doing nothing but fishing to see what he could catch. I thought an American President would need some substantial evidence against him before launching a year and a half investigation? Instead, we get an investigation trying to find evidence by the party who is bitter over losing the election

This. This indictment means absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of "punishing" someone for "something".
 
Brah. Collusion ain't a crime and Russias influence did not impact the election. Hillary lost. Trump Won. Move on..

It's an impeachable offense. And this can no longer be called a "witch hunt". I said at the time he gave that speech on July 27, 2016 calling for Russians to "find" Hillary Clinton's e-mails that those words could come back to haunt him later. Some people on here actually defended him (such as hog88, I remember) because he was "just kidding". It was an incredibly stupid thing to say at the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Trump spoke directly to Russian agents and gave them a directive to commit an illegal act and they followed his direction = Collusion.

😂😂😂😂 freaking hilarious. I’m channeling a message to you right now. Guess what I’m saying. 😂😂
 
It's an impeachable offense. And this can no longer be called a "witch hunt". I said at the time he gave that speech on July 27, 2016 calling for Russians to "find" Hillary Clinton's e-mails that those words could come back to haunt him later. Some people on here actually defended him (such as hog88, I remember) because he was "just kidding". It was an incredibly stupid thing to say at the time.

Suggestion. Start at the beginning of the thread and read all posts really slow...
 
The special counsel's investigation should be centered on who lost classified documents rather than who got them. Security has always been the responsibility of the holder, and it is always assumed that someone else would try to take sensitive materials. It's the very reason we put locks on our doors, but the locks do no good unless the owner uses them properly.

I'll bet you, just like I, have attended bunches of security classes and training, and all have hammered that security is the responsibility of everyone ... to keep stuff secure. Just like you say Mueller is looking in all the wrong places, and trying to hold the wrong people responsible. I'd bet the record on US and Russian/Soviet election meddling is running neck and neck.
this^^^^^^^^^^^^

Of course if your name is Clinton none of this applies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
It's an impeachable offense. And this can no longer be called a "witch hunt". I said at the time he gave that speech on July 27, 2016 calling for Russians to "find" Hillary Clinton's e-mails that those words could come back to haunt him later. Some people on here actually defended him (such as hog88, I remember) because he was "just kidding". It was an incredibly stupid thing to say at the time.

Good God.....go to the strip club and take lots of $20s.....the girls will sit on your lap and agree with you as long as the money is flowing.......
 
Not claiming that at all. Just that the timing of the Trump Tower meeting, the promise of dirt on Hillary, Donny's open desire to get that dirt, and then the launching of DC Leaks website should be looked into. Maybe a coincidence, but something that should be ferreted out.
Kind of like two grandparents randomly meeting on a random airport ramp.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement













Back
Top