FBI Trump-hater Strozk to testify publicly

#152
#152
T-TownVol said:
You don't think that establishing S to be the liar, that he is, to be relevant??
Click to expand...

In his personal relationships? No. That is not relevant to his job performance. If lying to our wives or ex-wives could be used against us in the evaluation of our job performance? Many of us would be in trouble. That was a personal attack and unprofessional.
 
#153
#153
BowlBrother85 said:
In his personal relationships? No. That is not relevant to his job performance. If lying to our wives or ex-wives could be used against us in the evaluation of our job performance? Many of us would be in trouble. That was a personal attack and unprofessional.
Click to expand...

Why do you have an ex-wife, Peter?
 
#155
#155
BowlBrother85 said:
In his personal relationships? No. That is not relevant to his job performance. If lying to our wives or ex-wives could be used against us in the evaluation of our job performance? Many of us would be in trouble. That was a personal attack and unprofessional.
Click to expand...

Hypocrite.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#157
#157
Franklin Pierce said:
Not one single person has been indicted for conspiracy/collusion with the Russians to influence American elections.

Yet the witch hunt, with corrupt investigators, goes on and on.
Click to expand...

Still not to the halfway point of the Starr investigation. And what did Monica Lewinsky have to do with Whitewater?
 
#160
#160
And what about that dude from North Carolina? He may be one of the most bizarre looking creatures I've ever seen. It was funny seeing him have his a55 handed to him a couple of times.
 
#167
#167
Bassmaster_Vol said:
“Have you no decency” the dems ask the questioners as they defend the guy having an affair on his wife. Amazing
Click to expand...

I get that the whole thing is a sideshow, but for the life of me I don't get the vitriol and the way Dems are going to the mat for this guy. It doesn't help their cause and he really doesn't seem worth it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#169
#169
Squints said:
Kind of like dims who can’t call out their own?

Continue to shoehorn all Republicans into the pool of infidelity, though....

JFK, LBJ, Willy?
Click to expand...

It wasn't the democrats claiming to be the "Moral majority" , the party for the fundamentalists, or the party of "family values."

That was Newt and Rush. It's a whole different level of hypocrisy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#170
#170
luthervol said:
It wasn't the democrats claiming to be the "Moral majority" , the party for the fundamentalists, or the party of "family values."

That was Newt and Rush. It's a whole different level of hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

I don’t give two damns about who was claiming what and when they claimed it, I’m talking about the dims eager sanctimoniousness to squeal like pigs over Trump (and others) but nothing but crickets when it comes to one of their own.

I heard Trump tagged Stormy X times in Y minutes, though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#171
#171
So how them blue balls feeling boys? I guess you should be used to it at this point. Seems about once a week Fox gets you all hot and bothered about the next deep state theory and then...nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#172
#172
evillawyer said:
So how them blue balls feeling boys? I guess you should be used to it at this point. Seems about once a week Fox gets you all hot and bothered about the next deep state theory and then...nothing.
Click to expand...

I'm waiting on the IG report on the Russia investigation. And Mueller of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#173
#173
evillawyer said:
So how them blue balls feeling boys? I guess you should be used to it at this point. Seems about once a week Fox gets you all hot and bothered about the next deep state theory and then...nothing.
Click to expand...

You are definitely an authority on blue balls LG.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top